Regionalizing ovarian cancer cytoreduction to high-volume centers and the impact on patient travel in New York State.

To evaluate the theoretical impact of regionalizing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer (OC) to high-volume facilities on patient travel. We retrospectively identified patients with OC who underwent cytoreduction between 1/1/2004–12/31/2018 from the New York State Cancer Registry and Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Hospitals were stratified by low-volume (<21 cytoreductive surgical procedures for OC annually) and high-volume centers (≥21 procedures annually). A simulation was performed; outcomes of interest were driving distance and time between the centroid of the patient's residence zip code and the treating facility zip code. Overall, 60,493 patients met inclusion criteria. Between 2004 and 2018, 210 facilities were performing cytoreductive surgery for OC in New York; 159 facilities (75.7%) met low-volume and 51 (24.3%) met high-volume criteria. Overall, 10,514 patients (17.4%) were treated at low-volume and 49,979 (82.6%) at high-volume facilities. In 2004, 78.2% of patients were treated at high-volume facilities, which increased to 84.6% in 2018 (P <.0001). Median travel distance and time for patients treated at high-volume centers was 12.2 miles (IQR, 5.6–25.5) and 23.0 min (IQR, 15.2–37.0), and 8.2 miles (IQR, 3.7–15.9) and 16.8 min (IQR, 12.4–26.0) for patients treated at low-volume centers. If cytoreductive surgery was centralized to high-volume centers, median distance and time traveled for patients originally treated at low-volume centers would be 11.2 miles (IQR, 3.8–32.3; P <.001) and 20.2 min (IQR, 13.6–43.0; P <.001). Centralizing cytoreductive surgery for OC to high-volume centers in New York would increase patient travel burden by negligible amounts of distance and time for most patients. • The impact on patient travel from ovarian cancer surgery regionalization to high-volume centers has not been studied. • Centralizing ovarian cancer surgery in New York State would increase patient travel by negligible distance and time. • These findings could have future implications for patient education and health policy on the regionalization of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]