A re-examination of process-outcome relations in cognitive therapy for depression: Disaggregating within-patient and between-patient effects.
In: Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Jg. 26 (2016-07-01), Heft 4, S. 387-98
academicJournal
Zugriff:
Objective: We previously examined alliance and therapist adherence as predictors of symptom change. Applying a new analytic strategy, we can ensure that any relations identified were not attributable to stable patient characteristics.
Method: Participants were 57 depressed cognitive therapy patients. We disaggregated within- and between-patient variation in process measures.
Results: Between-patients, variability in adherence to Cognitive Methods and Negotiating/Structuring predicted patients' symptom change. Within-patients, only variability in ratings of adherence to Cognitive Methods predicted next-session symptom change.
Conclusions: Relations involving between-patient process variables are potentially attributable to stable patient characteristics. However, the relation of within-patient Cognitive Methods and session-to-session symptom change cannot be attributed to stable characteristics and is consistent with a causal relationship.
Titel: |
A re-examination of process-outcome relations in cognitive therapy for depression: Disaggregating within-patient and between-patient effects.
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Sasso, KE ; Strunk, DR ; Braun, JD ; DeRubeis, RJ ; Brotman, MA |
Zeitschrift: | Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Jg. 26 (2016-07-01), Heft 4, S. 387-98 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2005- : London : Routledge ; <i>Original Publication</i>: New York, NY, USA : Guilford Publications, [1991-, 2016 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 1468-4381 (electronic) |
DOI: | 10.1080/10503307.2015.1026423 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|