Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Using Societal Values to Inform Public Health Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Health Preference Research.

DiSantostefano, RL ; Terris-Prestholt, F
In: The patient, Jg. 14 (2021-05-01), Heft 3, S. 303-307
Online academicJournal

Titel:
Using Societal Values to Inform Public Health Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Health Preference Research.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: DiSantostefano, RL ; Terris-Prestholt, F
Link:
Zeitschrift: The patient, Jg. 14 (2021-05-01), Heft 3, S. 303-307
Veröffentlichung: Auckland : Adis, Springer International ; <i>Original Publication</i>: Chester, UK : Wolters Kluwer Health/Adis, 2021
Medientyp: academicJournal
ISSN: 1178-1661 (electronic)
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00516-0
Schlagwort:
  • Australia epidemiology
  • COVID-19 Vaccines administration & dosage
  • Communicable Disease Control organization & administration
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Health Care Rationing organization & administration
  • Humans
  • Pandemics
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Singapore epidemiology
  • Vaccination Coverage
  • COVID-19 epidemiology
  • Choice Behavior
  • Health Policy
  • Public Opinion
Sonstiges:
  • Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
  • Sprachen: English
  • Publication Type: Editorial; Introductory Journal Article
  • Language: English
  • [Patient] 2021 May; Vol. 14 (3), pp. 303-307. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2021 Apr 22.
  • MeSH Terms: Choice Behavior* ; Health Policy* ; Public Opinion* ; COVID-19 / *epidemiology ; Australia / epidemiology ; COVID-19 Vaccines / administration & dosage ; Communicable Disease Control / organization & administration ; Decision Support Techniques ; Health Care Rationing / organization & administration ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Severity of Illness Index ; Singapore / epidemiology ; Vaccination Coverage
  • References: Ozdemir S, Tan SNG, Chaudhry I, et al. Public preferences for government response policies on outbreak control. Patient. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00494-9 . (PMID: 10.1007/s40271-020-00494-9338400788035860) ; Manipis K, Street D, Cronin P, et al. Exploring the trade-off between economic and health outcomes during a pandemic: a discrete choice experiment of lockdown policies in Australia. Patient. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00503-5 . (PMID: 10.1007/s40271-021-00503-5336940767946575) ; Degeling C, et al. Changes in public preferences for technologically enhanced surveillance following the COVID-19 pandemic: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e041592. (PMID: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041592) ; Jonker M, et al. COVID-19 contact tracing apps: predicted uptake in the Netherlands based on a discrete choice experiment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(10):e20741. (PMID: 10.2196/20741) ; Cohen IG, Gostin LO, Weitzner DJ. Digital smartphone tracking for COVID-19: public health and civil liberties in tension. JAMA. 2020;323(23):2371–2. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2020.8570) ; Sabat I, et al. United but divided: policy responses and people’s perceptions in the EU during the COVID-19 outbreak. Health Policy. 2020;124(9):909–18. (PMID: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.009) ; Reed S, Gonzalez JM, Johnson FR. Willingness to accept trade-offs among COVID-19 cases, social-distancing restrictions, and economic impact: a nationwide US study. Value Health. 2020;23(11):1438–43. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.003) ; Emanuel EJ, et al. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):2049–55. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114) ; Maves RC, et al. Triage of scarce critical care resources in COVID-19 an implementation guide for regional allocation: an expert panel report of the Task Force for Mass Critical Care and the American College of Chest Physicians. Chest. 2020;158(1):212–25. (PMID: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.063) ; Norman R, Robinson S, Dickinson H, et al. Public preferences for allocating ventilators in an intensive care unit: a discrete choice experiment. Patient. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00498-z . (PMID: 10.1007/s40271-021-00498-z336601637929628) ; Han SA, Koch VG. Clinical and ethical considerations in allocation of ventilators in an influenza pandemic or other public health disaster: a comparison of the 2007 and 2015 New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14(6):e35–44.  https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.232 . (PMID: 10.1017/dmp.2020.23232660660) ; Piscitello GM, et al. Variation in ventilator allocation guidelines by US state during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e2012606. (PMID: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12606) ; Reynolds JM, Guidry-Grimes L, Savin K. Against personal ventilator reallocation. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021;30(2):272–84.   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180120000833 . (PMID: 10.1017/S096318012000083333004101) ; Yahya AS, Khawaja S. Medical ethics and ventilator allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2020;22(4):20com02687. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.20com02687. (PMID: 10.4088/PCC.20com0268732678525) ; Bauer J, et al. Access to intensive care in 14 European countries: a spatial analysis of intensive care need and capacity in the light of COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(11):2026–34. (PMID: 10.1007/s00134-020-06229-6) ; Shoukat A, et al. Projecting demand for critical care beds during COVID-19 outbreaks in Canada. CMAJ. 2020;192(19):E489-e496. (PMID: 10.1503/cmaj.200457) ; Gijsbers M, Keizer IE, Schouten SE, et al. Public preferences in priority setting when admitting patients to the ICU during the COVID-19 crisis: a pilot study. Patient. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00504-4 . (PMID: 10.1007/s40271-021-00504-4337489307982314) ; Grover S, McClelland A, Furnham A. Preferences for scarce medical resource allocation: differences between experts and the general public and implications for the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Health Psychol. 2020;25(4):889–901. (PMID: 10.1111/bjhp.12439) ; Ubel PA, et al. Allocation of transplantable organs: do people want to punish patients for causing their illness? Liver Transpl. 2001;7(7):600–7. (PMID: 10.1053/jlts.2001.25361) ; Burki TK. Herd immunity for COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(2):135–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30555-5 . (PMID: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30555-533245861) ; Clemente-Suárez VJ, Hormeño-Holgado A, Jiménez M, Benitez-Agudelo JC, Navarro-Jiménez E, Perez-Palencia N, Maestre-Serrano R, Laborde-Cárdenas CC, Tornero-Aguilera JF. Dynamics of population immunity due to the herd effect in the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines (Basel). 2020;8(2):236. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8020236 . (PMID: 10.3390/vaccines8020236) ; Frederiksen LSF, et al. The long road toward COVID-19 herd immunity: vaccine platform technologies and mass immunization strategies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1817. (PMID: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01817) ; Kwok KO, et al. Herd immunity—estimating the level required to halt the COVID-19 epidemics in affected countries. J Infect. 2020;80(6):e32–3. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.027) ; Phelan AL. COVID-19 immunity passports and vaccination certificates: scientific, equitable, and legal challenges. Lancet. 2020;395(10237):1595–8. (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31034-5) ; Dror AA, et al. Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(8):775–9. (PMID: 10.1007/s10654-020-00671-y) ; Harrison EA, Wu JW. Vaccine confidence in the time of COVID-19. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(4):325–30. (PMID: 10.1007/s10654-020-00634-3) ; McAteer J, Yildirim I, Chahroudi A. The VACCINES act: deciphering vaccine hesitancy in the time of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(15):703–5. (PMID: 10.1093/cid/ciaa433) ; Puri N, et al. Social media and vaccine hesitancy: new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(11):2586–93. (PMID: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846) ; Tervonen T, Jimenez-Moreno AC, Krucien N, et al. Willingness to wait for a vaccine against COVID-19: results of a preference survey. Patient. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00483-y . (PMID: 10.1007/s40271-020-00483-y333139917733866) ; Goldman RD, et al. Caregivers’ willingness to accept expedited vaccine research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. Clin Ther. 2020;42(11):2124–33. (PMID: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.09.012) ; González-Melado FJ, Di Pietro ML. The vaccine against COVID-19 and institutional trust. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2020.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2020.08.001 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.eimc.2020.08.001330694937834478) ; Mahase E. Covid-19: Vaccine trials need more transparency to enable scrutiny and earn public trust, say experts. BMJ. 2020;371:m4042. (PMID: 10.1136/bmj.m4042) ; Ojikutu BO, Stephenson KE, Mayer KH, Emmons KM. Building trust in COVID-19 vaccines and beyond through authentic community investment. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(3):366–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306087 . (PMID: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306087333013527893367) ; Opel DJ, Salmon DA, Marcuse EK. Building trust to achieve confidence in COVID-19 vaccines. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2025672. (PMID: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25672) ; Schwartz JL. Evaluating and deploying Covid-19 vaccines—the importance of transparency, scientific integrity, and public trust. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(18):1703–5. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMp2026393) ; Trogen B, Oshinsky D, Caplan A. Adverse consequences of rushing a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: implications for public trust. JAMA. 2020;323(24):2460–1. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2020.8917) ; Warren RC, et al. Trustworthiness before trust—covid-19 vaccine trials and the black community. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(22):e121. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMp2030033) ; Craig BM. United States COVID-19 vaccination preferences (CVP): 2020 hindsight. Patient. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00508-0. ; Brown RCH, et al. The scientific and ethical feasibility of immunity passports. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(3):e58–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30766-0 . (PMID: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30766-033075284) ; Brown RCH, et al. Passport to freedom? Immunity passports for COVID-19. J Med Ethics. 2020;46(10):652–9. (PMID: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106365) ; Kofler N, Baylis F. Ten reasons why immunity passports are a bad idea. Nature. 2020;581(7809):379–81. (PMID: 10.1038/d41586-020-01451-0) ; Persad G, Emanuel EJ. The ethics of COVID-19 immunity-based licenses (“immunity passports”). JAMA. 2020;323(22):2241–2. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2020.8102) ; Voo TC, Clapham H, Tam CC. Ethical implementation of immunity passports during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Infect Dis. 2020;222(5):715–8. (PMID: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa352) ; Tidy J. Covid-19: vaccines and vaccine passports being sold on darknet. 2021 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-56489574 . Accessed 30 Mar 2021. ; European Commission. Coronavirus: Commission proposes a Digital Green Certificate [media release]. 2021 Mar 17. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_1181 . ; Poteet S, Craig BM. QALYs for COVID-19: a comparison of US EQ-5D-5L value sets. Patient. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z . (PMID: 10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z337828408007385) ; Donaldson C, Mitton C. Coronavirus: where has all the health economics gone? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(11):466–8. (PMID: 326108087719210) ; Eikenberry SE, et al. To mask or not to mask: modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic. Infect Dis Model. 2020;5:293–308. (PMID: 323559047186508) ; Lyu W, Wehby GL. Community use of face masks and COVID-19: evidence from a natural experiment of state mandates in the US. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39(8):1419–25. (PMID: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00818) ; Matuschek C, et al. Face masks: benefits and risks during the COVID-19 crisis. Eur J Med Res. 2020;25(1):32. (PMID: 10.1186/s40001-020-00430-5)
  • Substance Nomenclature: 0 (COVID-19 Vaccines)
  • Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20210422 Date Completed: 20210512 Latest Revision: 20210512
  • Update Code: 20240513
  • PubMed Central ID: PMC8060338

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

oder
oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

oder
oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -