Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article
- Language: English
- [J Surg Oncol] 2021 Sep; Vol. 124 (4), pp. 510-520. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2021 Jun 16.
- MeSH Terms: Patient Reported Outcome Measures* ; Quality of Life* ; Breast Implantation / *methods ; Breast Neoplasms / *surgery ; Mammaplasty / *methods ; Tissue Expansion / *methods ; Acellular Dermis ; Adult ; Aged ; Breast Neoplasms / pathology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors
- References: Cancer Key Statistics. https://www.who.int/cancer/resources/keyfacts/en/. ; Ganz PA . Psychological and social aspects of breast cancer. Oncology. 2008;22(6):642-646 650; discussion 650, 653. ; Filiberti A , Rimoldi A , Tamburini M , et al. Breast reconstruction: a psychological survey. Eur J Plastic Surg. 1989;12(5):214-219. ; Wilkins EG , Cederna PS , Lowery JC , et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1014-1025 discussion 1026-1017. ; Metcalfe KA , Semple J , Quan ML , et al. Changes in psychosocial functioning 1 year after mastectomy alone, delayed breast reconstruction, or immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):233-241. ; Fobair P , Stewart SL , Chang S , D'Onofrio C , Banks PJ , Bloom JR . Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(7):579-594. ; Fanakidou I , Zyga S , Alikari V , Tsironi M , Stathoulis J , Theofilou P . Mental health, loneliness, and illness perception outcomes in quality of life among young breast cancer patients after mastectomy: the role of breast reconstruction. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(2):539-543. ; Atisha D , Alderman AK , Lowery JC , Kuhn LE , Davis J , Wilkins EG . Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg. 2008;247(6):1019-1028. ; Schain WS , Wellisch DK , Pasnau RO , Landsverk J . The sooner the better: a study of psychological factors in women undergoing immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142(1):40-46. ; Chao LF , Patel KM , Chen SC , et al. Monitoring patient-centered outcomes through the progression of breast reconstruction: a multicentered prospective longitudinal evaluation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(2):299-308. ; Dauplat J , Kwiatkowski F , Rouanet P , et al. Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2017;104(9):1197-1206. ; Patani N , Devalia H , Anderson A , Mokbel K . Oncological safety and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Surg Oncol. 2008;17(2):97-105. ; Mustonen P , Lepistö J , Papp A , et al. The surgical and oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30(8):817-823. ; Ryu JM , Park S , Paik HJ , et al. Oncologic safety of immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy: short-term outcomes of a matched case-control study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17(3):204-210. ; Chalfoun C , Lane K . Chapter 2-Oncologic considerations for breast reconstruction. In: Hall-Findlay EJ , Evans GRD , eds. Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Breast. Edinburgh: W.B. Saunders; 2010:11-17. ; Gurunluoglu R , Gurunluoglu A , Williams SA , Tebockhorst S . Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(1):103-110. ; Albornoz CR , Bach PB , Mehrara BJ , et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):15-23. ; Clarke-Pearson EM , Lin AM , Hertl C , Austen WG , Colwell AS . Revisions in implant-based breast reconstruction: how does direct-to-implant measure up? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(6):1690-1699. ; Krishnan NM , Fischer JP , Basta MN , Nahabedian MY . Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(3):537-547. ; Srinivasa DR , Garvey PB , Qi J , et al. Direct-to-implant versus two-stage tissue expander/implant reconstruction: 2-year risks and patient-reported outcomes from a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5):869-877. ; Azouz V , Lopez S , Wagner DS . Surgeon-controlled comparison of direct-to-implant and 2-stage tissue expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(3):212-216. ; Susarla SM , Ganske I , Helliwell L , Morris D , Eriksson E , Chun YS . Comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in immediate single-stage versus two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(1):1e-8e. ; Nahabedian MY . Current approaches to prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):871-880. ; Antony AK , Robinson EC . An Algorithmic approach to prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: version 2.0. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(5):1311-1319. ; Negenborn VL , Smit JM , Dikmans REG , et al. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2019;106(5):586-595. ; Sorkin M , Qi J , Kim HM , et al. Acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction: a multicenter assessment of risks and benefits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(6):1091-1100. ; Potter S , MacKenzie M , Blazeby JM . Does the addition of mesh improve outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer? BMJ. 2018;362:k2607. ; Manrique OJ , Huang TC , Martinez-Jorge J , et al. Prepectoral two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: do we see a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(2):263e-272e. ; Serrurier LCJ , Rayne S , Venter M , Benn CA . Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without the use of an acellular dermal matrix is cost effective and oncologically safe. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(4):809-817. ; Wang HY , Ali RS , Chen SC , Chao TC , Cheng MH . One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implant following skin-sparing mastectomy in Asian patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(4):362-366. ; Pusic AL , Klassen AF , Scott AM , Klok JA , Cordeiro PG , Cano SJ . Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the Breast-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345-353. ; Potter S , Conroy EJ , Cutress RI , et al. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):254-266. ; Engel H , Huang JJ , Lin CY , Lam WL , Gazyakan E , Cheng MH . Subcutaneous tissue expansion and subsequent subpectoral implantation for breast reconstruction in Asian patients: safety and outcome. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(2):135-143. ; Okumura S , Hyodo I , Iwata H , Kamei Y . Immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction without the use of acellular dermal matrix in Japanese breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer. 2020;27(4):759-764. ; Singla A , Singla A , Lai E , Caminer D . Subcutaneously placed breast implants after a skin-sparing mastectomy: do we always need ADM? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(7):e1371. ; Salibian AH , Harness JK , Mowlds DS . Staged suprapectoral expander/implant reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(1):30-39. ; Ter Louw RP , Nahabedian MY . Prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51s-59s. ; Sbitany H , Piper M , Lentz R . Prepectoral breast reconstruction: a safe alternative to submuscular prosthetic reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(3):432-443. ; Momeni A , Remington AC , Wan DC , Nguyen D , Gurtner GC . A matched-pair analysis of prepectoral with subpectoral breast reconstruction: is there a difference in postoperative complication rate? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(4):801-807. ; Antony AK , Poirier J , Madrigrano A , Kopkash KA , Robinson EC . Evolution of the surgical technique for "breast in a day" direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: transitioning from dual-plane to prepectoral implant placement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(6):1547-1556. ; Qureshi AA , Broderick K , Funk S , Reaven N , Tenenbaum MM , Myckatyn TM . Direct hospital cost of outcome pathways in implant-based reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(8):e831. ; Negenborn VL , Dikmans REG , Bouman MB , Wilschut JA , Mullender MG , Salzberg CA . Patient-reported outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based breast reconstruction: a cross-sectional study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(2):e1654. ; Wagner RD , Braun TL , Zhu H , Winocour S . A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(7):1051-1059.
- Contributed Indexing: Keywords: acellular dermal matrix; implant reconstruction; one-stage reconstruction; subpectoral plane; two-stage reconstruction
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20210616 Date Completed: 20210819 Latest Revision: 20210819
- Update Code: 20231215
|