Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article
- Language: English
- [Environ Sci Pollut Res Int] 2022 May; Vol. 29 (22), pp. 33075-33094. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 Jan 13.
- MeSH Terms: Carbon* / analysis ; Commerce* ; Carbon Dioxide / analysis ; China ; Economic Development ; Internationality ; United States
- References: Andersson FN (2018) International trade and carbon emissions: the role of Chinese institutional and policy reforms. J Environ Manage 205:29–39. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.052) ; Ang BW (2015) LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy 86:233–238. (PMID: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.007) ; BP (2020) BP statistical review of world energy 2019. ; Brown MA, Kim G, Smith AM, Southworth K (2017) Exploring the impact of energy efficiency as a carbon mitigation strategy in the U.S. Energy Policy 109:249–259. (PMID: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.044) ; Cao Y et al (2018) Driving forces of national and regional carbon intensity changes in China: temporal and spatial multiplicative structural decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 213:1380–1410. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.155) ; Carton W, Asiyanbi A, Beck S, Buck HJ, Lund JF (2020) Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11:e671. ; Celik S (2020) The effects of climate change on human behaviors. In: Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth. Springer, pp 577–589. ; Chen X, Shuai C, Wu Y, Zhang Y (2020) Analysis on the carbon emission peaks of China's industrial, building, transport, and agricultural sectors. Science of the Total Environment 709:135768. ; Chen Y, Hafstead MA (2019) Using a carbon tax to meet US international climate pledges. J Climate Change Economics 10:1950002. (PMID: 10.1142/S2010007819500027) ; De Oliveira-De Jesus PM (2019) Effect of generation capacity factors on carbon emission intensity of electricity of Latin America & the Caribbean, a temporal IDA-LMDI analysis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews 101:516–526. (PMID: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.030) ; Duan Y, Jiang X (2021) haven or pollution halo? A Re-evaluation on the role of multinational enterprises in global CO2 emissions. Energy Economics:105181. ; Feng T, Du H, Zhang Z, Mi Z, Guan D, Zuo J (2020) Carbon transfer within China: insights from production fragmentation. Energy Economics 86:104647. ; Gozgor, Giray (2017) Does trade matter for carbon emissions in OECD countries? Evidence from a new trade openness measure. Environmental Science Pollution Research. ; Hasanov FJ, Liddle B, Mikayilov JI (2018) The impact of international trade on CO2 emissions in oil exporting countries: territory vs consumption emissions accounting. Energy Economics 74:343–350. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.004) ; Huang J, Liu Q, Cai X, Hao Y, Lei H (2018) The effect of technological factors on China’s carbon intensity: new evidence from a panel threshold model. Energy Policy 115:32–42. (PMID: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.008) ; IPCC (2014) The Synthesis Report of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. ; Khan AG, Hossain MA, Chen S (2021) Do financial development, trade openness, economic development, and energy consumption affect carbon emissions for an emerging country?. Environmental Science Pollution Research:1–11. ; Koondhar MA, Tan Z, Alam GM, Khan ZA, Wang L, Kong R (2021) Bioenergy consumption, carbon emissions, and agricultural bioeconomic growth: a systematic approach to carbon neutrality in China. Journal of Environmental Management 296:113242. ; Lahiani A, Mefteh-Wali S, Shahbaz M, Vo XV (2021) Does financial development influence renewable energy consumption to achieve carbon neutrality in the USA?. Energy Policy 158:112524. ; Lemery J, Knowlton K, Sorensen C (2021) Global climate change and human health: from science to practice. John Wiley & Sons. ; Li R, Su M (2017) The role of natural gas and renewable energy in curbing carbon emission: case study of the United States. Sustainability 9:600. (PMID: 10.3390/su9040600) ; Li Y, Chen K, Zheng N, Cai Q, Li Y, Lin C Strategy research on accelerating green and low-carbon development under the guidance of carbon peak and carbon neutral targets. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021. vol 1. IOP Publishing, p 012009. ; Lin B, Zhu J (2017) Energy and carbon intensity in China during the urbanization and industrialization process: a panel VAR approach. J Clean Prod 168:780–790. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.013) ; Liu C, Jiang Y, Xie R (2019a) Does income inequality facilitate carbon emission reduction in the US? J Clean Prod 217:380–387. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.242) ; Liu J, Qu J, Zhao K (2019b) Is China’s development conforms to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis? J Clean Prod 234:787–796. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.234) ; López LA, Arce G, Zafrilla JE (2013) Parcelling virtual carbon in the pollution haven hypothesis. Energy Economics 39:177–186. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.006) ; Mi Z, Meng J, Green F, Coffman DM, Guan D (2018) China’s “exported carbon” peak: patterns, drivers, and implications. Geophys Res Lett 45:4309–4318. (PMID: 10.1029/2018GL077915) ; Mutascu M, Sokic A (2020) Trade openness - CO2 emissions nexus: a wavelet evidence from EU. Environmental Modeling Assessment 25. ; Oliveira-De Jesus D, Paulo M, Galvis JJ, Rojas-Lozano D, Yusta JM (2020) Multitemporal LMDI Index decomposition analysis to explain the changes of ACI by the power sector in Latin America and the Caribbean between 1990–2017. Energies 13:2328. (PMID: 10.3390/en13092328) ; Pan B, Zhang Y (2020) Impact of affluence, nuclear and alternative energy on US carbon emissions from 1960 to 2014. Energy Strategy Reviews 32:100581. ; Plevin RJ, Delucchi MA, O’Hare M (2017) Fuel carbon intensity standards may not mitigate climate change. Energy Policy 105:93–97. (PMID: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.037) ; Raza SA, Shah N, Sharif A (2019) Time frequency relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in the United States: Evidence from transportation sector. Energy 173:706–720. (PMID: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.077) ; Roelfsema M et al (2020) Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement. Nat Commun 11:1–12. (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-020-15414-6) ; Sakai M, Barrett J (2016) Border carbon adjustments: addressing emissions embodied in trade. Energy Policy 92:102–110. (PMID: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.038) ; Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S (2017) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics 61:221–232. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008) ; Shao X, Zhong Y, Li Y, Altuntaş M (2021) Does environmental and renewable energy R&D help to achieve carbon neutrality target? A case of the US economy. Journal of Environmental Management 296:113229. ; Su B, Ang BW (2012) Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Economics 34:177–188. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.009) ; Su B, Ang BW (2015) Multiplicative decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity change using input–output analysis. Appl Energy 154:13–20. (PMID: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.101) ; Su B, Ang BW (2017) Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Economics 65:137–147. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.002) ; Tao R, Umar M, Naseer A, Razi U (2021) The dynamic effect of eco-innovation and environmental taxes on carbon neutrality target in emerging seven (E7) economies. Journal of Environmental Management 299:113525. ; Timmer MP, Dietzenbacher E, Los B, Stehrer R, De Vries GJ (2015) An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: the case of global automotive production. Rev Int Econ 23:575–605. (PMID: 10.1111/roie.12178) ; Wachsmuth J, Duscha V (2019) Achievability of the Paris targets in the EU—the role of demand-side-driven mitigation in different types of scenarios Energy Efficiency 12:403–421. ; Wang Z, Asghar MM, Zaidi SAH, Wang B (2019a) Dynamic linkages among CO 2 emissions, health expenditures, and economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science Pollution Research 26:15285–15299. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-019-04876-x) ; Wang Z et al (2019b) Pollution haven hypothesis of domestic trade in China: a perspective of SO2 emissions. Sci Total Environ 663:198–205. (PMID: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.287) ; Wang Q, Song X (2021) Why do China and India burn 60% of the world's coal? A decomposition analysis from a global perspective. Energy:120389. ; Wang Q, Wang L (2021) How does trade openness impact carbon intensity? Journal of Cleaner Production 295:126370. ; Wang Q, Zhang F (2021) The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth–evidence from 182 countries. Journal of cleaner production 279:123838. ; Wang Q, Guo J, Li R (2022a) Official development assistance and carbon emissions of recipient countries: a dynamic panel threshold analysis for low- and lower-middle-income countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption 29:158–170. (PMID: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.015) ; Wang Q, Li S, Li R, Jiang F (2022b) Underestimated impact of the COVID-19 on carbon emission reduction in developing countries – a novel assessment based on scenario analysis. Environmental Research 204:111990. ; Wang Q, Wang X, Li R (2022c) Does urbanization redefine the environmental Kuznets curve? An empirical analysis of 134 Countries. Sustainable Cities and Society 76:103382. ; Wang Z, Su B, Xie R, Long H (2020) China's aggregate embodied CO2 emission intensity from 2007 to 2012: a multi-region multiplicative structural decomposition analysis. Energy Economics 85:104568. ; Wang Z, Wei S-J, Zhu K (2013) Quantifying international production sharing at the bilateral and sector levels. National Bureau of Economic Research,. ; William BP, James B, Michele S (2017) Potential of windbreak trees to reduce carbon emissions by agricultural operations in the US. Forests 8:138. (PMID: 10.3390/f8050138) ; Wu L (2016) Paris Agreement: a roadmap to tackle climate and environment challenges. Oxford University Press. ; Xu H, Zhao G, Xie R, Zhu K (2020) A trade-related CO2 emissions and its composition: evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management 270:110893. ; Xu X, Mu M, Wang Q (2017) Recalculating CO2 emissions from the perspective of value-added trade: an input-output analysis of China’s trade data. Energy Policy 107:158–166. (PMID: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.026) ; Yang H, Shahzadi I, Hussain M (2021) USA carbon neutrality target: evaluating the role of environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity growth in limiting carbon emissions. Journal of Environmental Management 298:113385. ; Yang X, Su B (2019) Impacts of international export on global and regional carbon intensity. Applied Energy 253:113552. ; Zhang D, Wang Z, Li S, Zhang H (2021) Impact of land urbanization on carbon emissions in urban agglomerations of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health 18:1403. (PMID: 10.3390/ijerph18041403) ; Zhang W et al (2018) Revealing environmental inequality hidden in China’s inter-regional trade. Environmental Science Technology 52:7171–7181. (PMID: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00009) ; Zhang Z, Zhu K, Hewings GJ (2017) A multi-regional input–output analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis from the perspective of global production fragmentation. Energy Economics 64:13–23. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.007)
- Grant Information: 71874203 National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Carbon intensity; International trade; Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index; Multi-regional input–output analysis; Quantified impacts; The United States
- Substance Nomenclature: 142M471B3J (Carbon Dioxide) ; 7440-44-0 (Carbon)
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20220113 Date Completed: 20220509 Latest Revision: 20220509
- Update Code: 20240513
|