| Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article
- Language: English
- [Hist Philos Life Sci] 2022 Oct 21; Vol. 44 (4), pp. 49. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 Oct 21.
- MeSH Terms: Heredity* ; Genetics* / history ; Biometry ; Evolution, Molecular ; Research Design
- References: Ankeny, R. A. (2000). Marvelling at the marvel: The supposed conversion of A. D. Darbishire to Mendelism. Journal of the History of Biology, 33(2), 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004750216919. (PMID: 10.1023/A:1004750216919) ; Barnes, S. B. (1996). Explaining scientific consensus: The case of Mendelian genetics. Kyung-Man Kim. Isis, 87(1), 198–199. https://doi.org/10.1086/357470. (PMID: 10.1086/357470) ; Bateson, W., Saunders E. R., & Punnett, R. C. (1905). Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity (Reports to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society, Report II), pp. 4–99. ; Bateson, W. (1894). Materials for the study of variation. Macmillan. ; Bateson, W. (1897). On progress in the study of variation. Science Progress (1894-1898), 6(5), 554–568. ; Bateson, W. (1899). Hybridisation and cross-breeding as a method of scientific investigation. Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society, 24, 59–66. ; Bateson, W. (1902a). Mendel’s principles of heredity: A defence. Cambridge University Press. (PMID: 10.5962/bhl.title.105342) ; Bateson, W. (1902b). Heredity, differentiation, and other conceptions of biology: A consideration of Professor Karl Pearson’s paper ‘On the principle of Homotyposis.’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 69(451–458), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1901.0099. (PMID: 10.1098/rspl.1901.0099) ; Bateson, W. (1908). The methods and scope of genetics. An inaugural lecture delivered 23 October 1908. Cambridge University Press. (PMID: 10.5962/bhl.title.46237) ; Bateson, W., & Bateson, A. (1891). On variations in the floral symmetry of certain plants having irregular corollas. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 28(196), 386–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1891.tb01469.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1891.tb01469.x) ; Bateson, W., & Brindley, H. H. (1892). On some cases of variation in secondary sexual characters statistically examined. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, 60(4), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1892.tb01785.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1892.tb01785.x) ; Charlesworth, B., & Edwards, A. W. F. (2018). A century of variance. Significance, 15, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01170.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01170.x) ; Darbishire, A. D. (1905). On the supposed antagonism of Mendelian to biometric theories of heredity. Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Library and Philosophical Society, 49, 1–19. ; Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray. ; Esposito, M. (2013). Heredity, development and evolution: the unmodern synthesis of E.S. Russell. Theory in Biosciences, 132(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-013-0177-4. (PMID: 10.1007/s12064-013-0177-4) ; Farrall, L. E. (1975). Controversy and conflict in science: A case study—The English biometric school and Mendel’s laws. Social Studies of Science, 5, 269–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500302. (PMID: 10.1177/030631277500500302) ; Fisher, R. A. (1932). The bearing of genetics on theories of evolution. Science Progress, 27, 273–287. https://hdl.handle.net/2440/15112. ; Fisher, R. A. (1959). Natural selection from the genetical standpoint. Australian Journal of Science, 22, 16–17. https://hdl.handle.net/2440/15158. ; Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52, 399–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800012163. (PMID: 10.1017/S0080456800012163) ; Galton, F. (1886). Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 15, 246–263. (PMID: 10.2307/2841583) ; Galton, F. (1889). Natural inheritance. Macmillan. (PMID: 10.5962/bhl.title.32181) ; Galton, F. (1892). Hereditary genius (2nd ed.). Mcmillan. ; Galton, F. (1897). The average contribution of each several ancestor to the total heritage of the offspring. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 61, 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1897.0052. (PMID: 10.1098/rspl.1897.0052) ; Galton, F. (1901). Biometry. Biometrika, 1(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/1.1.7. (PMID: 10.1093/biomet/1.1.7) ; Gayon, J. (2007). Karl Pearson: Les enjeux du phénoménalisme dans les sciences biologiques. In J. Gayon & R. Burian (Eds.), Conceptions de la science, hier, aujourd’hui, demain (pp. 305–324). Ousia. ; Gayon, J. (2016). From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics. Compte Rendu Biologies, 339(7–8), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.009. (PMID: 10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.009) ; Gliboff, S. (2013). The many sides of Gregor Mendel. In O. Harman & M. R. Dietrich (Eds.), Outsider scientists: Routes to innovation in biology (pp. 27–44). University of Chicago Press. ; Herring, E. (2018). ‘Great is Darwin and Bergson his poet’: Julian Huxley’s other evolutionary synthesis. Annals of Science, 75(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2017.1407442. (PMID: 10.1080/00033790.2017.1407442) ; Hodge, J. (2011). Darwinism after Mendelism: The case of Sewall Wright’s intellectual synthesis in his shifting balance theory of evolution (1931). Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 42(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.008. (PMID: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.008) ; Hull, D. L. (1985). Darwinism as a historical entity: A historiographic proposal. In D. Kohn (Ed.), The Darwinian heritage (pp. 773–812). Princeton University Press. ; Jamieson, A., & Radick, G. (2013). Putting Mendel in his place: How curriculum reform in genetics and counterfactual history of science can work together. In K. Kampourakis (Ed.), The philosophy of biology: A companion for educators (pp. 577–595). Springer. (PMID: 10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5_25) ; Jamieson, A., & Radick, G. (2017). Genetic determinism in the genetics curriculum. Science & Education, 26(10), 1261–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9900-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s11191-017-9900-8) ; Kim, K.-M. (1994). Explaining scientific consensus: A sociological analysis of the reception of Mendelian genetics. Guilford Publications. ; Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. ; Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459–482). University of Illinois Press. ; Lakatos, I. (1978). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes (pp. 8–101). Cambridge University Press. (PMID: 10.1017/CBO9780511621123.003) ; Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. University of California Press. ; MacKenzie, D. A., & Barnes, S. B. (1975). Biometriker versus Mendelianer. Eine Kontroverse und ihre Erklärung. In N. Stehr & R. König (Eds.), Wissenschaftssoziologie. Studien und Materialien (pp. 165–196). Westdeutscher Verlag. (PMID: 10.1007/978-3-322-94332-3_9) ; Magnello, M. E. (2013). Galton’s Law of Ancestral Heredity. In S. Maloy & K. Hughes (Eds.), Brenner’s encyclopedia of genetics (pp. 143–146). Elsevier. (PMID: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374984-0.00060-7) ; Mayr, E. (1973). The recent historiography of genetics. Journal of the History of Biology, 6(1), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137301. (PMID: 10.1007/BF00137301) ; Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Belknap Press. ; Morrison, M. (2002). Modelling populations: Pearson and fisher on Mendelism and biometry. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53(1), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/53.1.39. (PMID: 10.1093/bjps/53.1.39) ; Müller-Wille, S. (2021). Gregor Mendel and the history of heredity. In M. R. Dietrich, M. E. Borrello, & O. Harman (Eds.), Handbook of the historiography of biology (pp. 105–126). Springer. (PMID: 10.1007/978-3-319-90119-0_8) ; Müller-Wille, S., & Orel, V. (2007). From Linnaean species to Mendelian factors: Elements of hybridism, 1751–1870. Annals of Science, 64(2), 171–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790601111567. (PMID: 10.1080/00033790601111567) ; Norton, B. J. (1975a). Biology and philosophy: The methodological foundations of biometry. Journal of the History of Biology, 8, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129596. (PMID: 10.1007/BF00129596) ; Norton, B. J. (1975b). Metaphysics and population genetics: Karl Pearson and the background to Fisher’s multi-factorial theory of inheritance. Annals of Science, 32, 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797500200461. (PMID: 10.1080/00033797500200461) ; Pearson, K. (1892). The grammar of science. Adam and Charles Black. (PMID: 10.1037/12962-000) ; Pearson, K. (1895). Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 58, 240–242. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1895.0041. (PMID: 10.1098/rspl.1895.0041) ; Pearson, K. (1898). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 187, 253–318. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1896.0007. (PMID: 10.1098/rsta.1896.0007) ; Pearson, K., et al. (1901). Mathematical contributions to the theory evolution. IX. On the principle of homotyposis and its relation to heredity, to the variability of the individual, and to that of the race. Part I. Homotyposis in the vegetable Kingdom. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 197(287–299), 285–379. ; Pearson, K. (1902a). On the fundamental conceptions of biology. Biometrika, 1(3), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331546. (PMID: 10.2307/2331546) ; Pearson, K. (1902b). On the systematic fitting of curves to observations and measurements. Biometrika, 1(3), 265–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/1.3.265. (PMID: 10.1093/biomet/1.3.265) ; Pearson, K. (1902c). Note on Mr. Bateson’s paper, “Heredity, differentiation, and other conceptions of biology: A consideration of Professor Karl Pearson’s paper ‘On the principle of homotyposis.’” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 69(451–458), 450–450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1901.0130. (PMID: 10.1098/rspl.1901.0130) ; Pearson, K. (1904). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XII. On a generalised theory of alternative inheritance, with special reference to Mendel’s laws. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 203, 53–86. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1904.0015. (PMID: 10.1098/rsta.1904.0015) ; Pearson, K. (1930). The life, letters and labours of Francis Galton. Correlation, personal identification and eugenics (Vol. 3a). Cambridge University Press. ; Pence, C. H. (2011). “Describing our whole experience”: The statistical philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and the Biomedical Sciences, 42, 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.07.011. (PMID: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.07.011) ; Provine, W. B. (1971). The origins of theoretical population genetics (1st ed.). Chicago University Press. ; Provine, W. B. (2001). The origins of theoretical population genetics (2nd ed.). Chicago University Press. (PMID: 10.7208/chicago/9780226788920.001.0001) ; Radick, G. (2005). Other histories, other biologies. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 80(56), 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100008778. (PMID: 10.1017/S1358246100008778) ; Radick, G. (2016a). Presidential address: Experimenting with the scientific past. The British Journal for the History of Science, 49(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087416000339. (PMID: 10.1017/S0007087416000339) ; Radick, G. (2016b). Teach students the biology of their time. Nature, 533(7603), 293–293. https://doi.org/10.1038/533293a. (PMID: 10.1038/533293a) ; Roll-Hansen, N. (1989). The crucial experiment of Wilhelm Johannsen. Biology and Philosophy, 4, 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426630. (PMID: 10.1007/BF02426630) ; Roll-Hansen, N. (2009). Sources of Wilhelm Johannsen’s genotype theory. Journal of the History of Biology, 42, 457–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-008-9166-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s10739-008-9166-8) ; Roll-Hansen, N. (2014). Commentary: Wilhelm Johannsen and the problem of heredity at the turn of the 19th century. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(4), 1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu066. (PMID: 10.1093/ije/dyu066) ; Shan, Y. (2020). Doing integrated history and philosophy of science: A case study of the origin of genetics. Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science. Springer. ; Shan, Y. (2021). Beyond Mendelism and Biometry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 89, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.014. (PMID: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.014) ; Sloan, P. R. (2000). Mach’s phenomenalism and the British reception of Mendelism. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences – Series III – Sciences de La Vie, 323, 1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01255-5. (PMID: 10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01255-5) ; Stoltzfus, A., & Cable, K. (2014). Mendelism-mutationism: The forgotten evolutionary synthesis. Journal of the History of Biology, 47, 501–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-014-9383-2. (PMID: 10.1007/s10739-014-9383-2) ; Sturtevant, A. H. (1965). A history of genetics (1st ed.). Harper & Row. ; Tabery, J. G. (2004). The “Evolutionary Synthesis” of George Udny Yule. Journal of the History of Biology, 37, 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIST.0000020390.75208.ac. (PMID: 10.1023/B:HIST.0000020390.75208.ac) ; Vicedo, M. (1995). What is that thing called Mendelian genetics? Social Studies of Science, 25, 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631295025002018. (PMID: 10.1177/030631295025002018) ; Visscher, P. M., & Goddard, M. E. (2019). From R. A. Fisher’s 1918 paper to GWAS a century later. Genetics, 211(4), 1125–1130. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.301594. (PMID: 10.1534/genetics.118.301594) ; Waters, C. K. (2004). What was classical genetics? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 35(4), 783–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2004.03.018. (PMID: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2004.03.018) ; Weldon, W. F. R. (1894). The study of animal variation. Nature, 50, 25–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/050025a0. (PMID: 10.1038/050025a0) ; Weldon, W. F. R. (1895). Remarks on variation in animals and plants. To accompany the first report of the committee for conducting statistical inquiries into the measurable characteristics of plants and animals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 57, 379–382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1894.0166. (PMID: 10.1098/rspl.1894.0166) ; Weldon, W. F. R. (1902a). Mendel’s laws of alternative inheritance in peas. Biometrika, 1(2), 228–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/1.2.228. (PMID: 10.1093/biomet/1.2.228) ; Weldon, W. F. R. (1902b). On the ambiguity of Mendel’s categories. Biometrika, 2(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/2.1.44. (PMID: 10.1093/biomet/2.1.44) ; Weldon, W. F. R. (1905). Theory of inheritance. Unpublished, UCL Library. ; Whewell, W. (1858). Novum organon renovatum. John W. Parker. ; Wood, R. J., & Orel, V. (2005). Scientific breeding in Central Europe during the early nineteenth century: Background to Mendel’s later work. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 239–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-004-5427-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s10739-004-5427-3) ; Yule, G. U. (1902). Mendel’s laws and their probable relations to intra-racial heredity. New Phytologist, 1(193–207), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1902.tb07336.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1902.tb07336.x)
- Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Biometry; Evolution; Karl Pearson; Mendelian genetics; Modern evolutionary synthesis; William Bateson
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20221021 Date Completed: 20221025 Latest Revision: 20221227
- Update Code: 20240513
|
