Einzeltreffer — DigiBib

Background: Femoral hernia (FH) is traditionally treated by open surgery (OS). Laparoscopic treatment has also shown good results in treating FH. However, there have been few comparative studies of these two techniques. Therefore, our aim was to compare the outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgical FH treatment.

Methods: Adult patients with primary unilateral FH undergoing OS or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair at our hospital from January 2013 to June 2018 were included in this study. Patients with history of abdominal surgery, contraindications to general anesthesia and those not wishing to receive general anesthesia received OS. Demographics, operation details and complications were compared retrospectively between the two groups.

Results: A total of 132 patients were recruited to the study, 62 and 70 of whom underwent OS and TAPP, respectively. Compared to OS group, the TAPP group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 2.0 days, respectively, P < 0.05) and a lower postoperative pain score (3.0 vs. 1.0, P < 0.05), and took less time to return to normal activities (13.0 vs. 6.0 days, respectively, P < 0.05). The overall complication rates were equivalent between the groups (10 vs. 9.7%, OR = 1.037, 95% CI 0.329-3.270).

Conclusions: Both laparoscopic and open surgery appear to be safe and effective in a cohort of patients with femoral hernia and laparoscopic surgery might offer some advantages in reducing length of hospital stay, lower postoperative pain score and quicker return to activities.

Titel:	Comparison of open preperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair for primary unilateral femoral hernia: a retrospective cohort study of 132 case.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	Liu, J ; Bittner, R ; Shen, Y ; Chen, J
Link:	Full Text Finder (Volltext)
Zeitschrift:	Surgical endoscopy, Jg. 37 (2023-04-01), Heft 4, S. 2712-2718
Veröffentlichung:	1992- : New York : Springer ; <i>Original Publication</i>: [Berlin] : Springer International, c1987-, 2023
Medientyp:	academicJournal
ISSN:	1432-2218 (electronic)
DOI:	10.1007/s00464-022-09759-w
Schlagwort:	Adult Humans Herniorrhaphy methods Retrospective Studies Surgical Mesh Pain, Postoperative surgery Hernia, Femoral surgery Hernia, Inguinal surgery
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE Sprachen: English Publication Type: Journal Article Language: English [Surg Endosc] 2023 Apr; Vol. 37 (4), pp. 2712-2718. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 Nov 30. MeSH Terms: Hernia, Femoral* / surgery ; Hernia, Inguinal* / surgery ; Adult ; Humans ; Herniorrhaphy / methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Mesh ; Pain, Postoperative / surgery References: Burcharth J, Pedersen M, Bisgaard T, Pedersen C, Rosenberg J (2013) Nationwide prevalence of groin hernia repair. PLoS ONE 8(1):e54367. (PMID: 23342139354471310.1371/journal.pone.0054367) ; Dahlstrand U, Wollert S, Nordin P, Sandblom G, Gunnarsson U (2009) Emergency femoral hernia repair: a study based on a national register. Ann Surg 249(4):672–676. (PMID: 1930021910.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed943) ; Humes DJ, Radcliffe RS, Camm C, West J (2013) Population-based study of presentation and adverse outcomes after femoral hernia surgery. Br J Surg 100(13):1827–1832. (PMID: 2422737110.1002/bjs.9336) ; Beadles CA, Meagher AD, Charles AG (2015) Trends in emergent hernia repair in the United States. JAMA Surg 150(3):194–200. (PMID: 2556494610.1001/jamasurg.2014.1242) ; Koch A, Edwards A, Haapaniemi S, Nordin P, Kald A (2005) Prospective evaluation of 6895 groin hernia repairs in women. Br J Surg 92(12):1553–1558. (PMID: 1618726810.1002/bjs.5156) ; HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–65. (PMID: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x) ; Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, Dunlop DD, Reda DJ, McCarthy M Jr, Neumayer LA, Barkun JS, Hoehn JL, Murphy JT, Sarosi GA Jr, Syme WC, Thompson JS, Wang J, Jonasson O (2006) Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 295(3):285–292. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.295.3.285) ; Andresen K, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Wara P, Rosenberg J (2014) Reoperation rates for laparoscopic vs open repair of femoral herniasin Denmark: a nationwide analysis. JAMA Surg 49(8):853–857. (PMID: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.177) ; Chen D, Su N, Wang W, Zhang Z, Guo M, Lu C, Zhang H (2018) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique versus open surgery with the ULTRAPRO Hernia System for the repair of female primary femoral hernias-an observational retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(49):e13575. (PMID: 3054447810.1097/MD.0000000000013575) ; Pélissier EP, Blum D, Marre P, Damas JM (2001) Inguinal hernia: a patch covering only the myopectineal orifice is effective. Hernia 5(2):84–87. (PMID: 1150565410.1007/s100290100002) ; Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2009) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843. ; Hernández-Irizarry R, Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Moreno M, Ali SM, Lohse CM, Farley DR (2012) Trends in emergent inguinal hernia surgery in Olmsted County, MN: a population-based study. Hernia 16(4):397–403. (PMID: 22695978363944110.1007/s10029-012-0926-1) ; Kurt N, Oncel M, Ozkan Z, Bingul S (2003) Risk and outcome of bowel resection in patients with incarcerated groin hernias: retrospective study. World J Surg 27(6):741–743. (PMID: 1272482610.1007/s00268-003-6826-x) ; Suppiah A, Gatt M, Barandiaran J, Heng MS, Perry EP (2007) Outcomes of emergency and elective femoral hernia surgery in four district general hospitals: a 4-year study. Hernia 11(6):509–512. (PMID: 1762873610.1007/s10029-007-0262-z) ; de Guzma´n CA-R, Picazo-Yeste J, Tenı´as-Burillo JM, Moreno-Sanz C, (2013) Improved outcomes of incarcerated femoral hernia: a multivariate analysis of predictive factors of bowel ischemia and potential impact on postoperative complication. Am J Surg 205(2):188–193. (PMID: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.03.011) ; Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, Jansen-Winkeln B, Gockel I (2017) Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg 17(1):55. (PMID: 28490321542432010.1186/s12893-017-0253-7) ; Köninger J, Redecke J, Butters M (2004) Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing shouldice lichtenstein and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389(5):361–365. (PMID: 1524374310.1007/s00423-004-0496-5) ; Li J, Wang X, Feng X, Gu Y, Tang R (2013) Comparison of open and laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of groin hernia. Surg Endosc 27(12):4702–4710. (PMID: 2397486210.1007/s00464-013-3118-x) ; Singh AN, Bansal VK, Misra MC, Kumar S, Rajeshwari S, Kumar A, Sagar R, Kumar, (2012) Testicular functions, chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26(5):1304–1317. (PMID: 2208333210.1007/s00464-011-2029-y) ; Eklund A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C (2010) Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 97(4):600–608. (PMID: 2018688910.1002/bjs.6904) ; Collaboration EHT (2002) Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 235(3):322–332. (PMID: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00003) ; Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, Stoker DL, Wellwood JM (2003) Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow up. BMJ 326(7397):1012–1013. (PMID: 1274292315475910.1136/bmj.326.7397.1012) ; Pisanu A, Podda M, Saba A, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A (2015) Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19(3):355–366. (PMID: 2503394310.1007/s10029-014-1281-1) ; Johansson B, Hallerbäck B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Román J (1999) Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 230(2):225–231. (PMID: 10450737142086510.1097/00000658-199908000-00013) ; Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, Zhao X, Jiang H (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25(1):234–239. (PMID: 2055236810.1007/s00464-010-1165-0) ; McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM (2003) EU hernia trialists collaboration laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:001785. ; Pironi D, Palazzini G, Panarese A, La Gioia G, Vendettuoli M, Romani AM, Filippini A (2008) Open mesh technique versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach in inguinal hernia repair our experience. G Chir 29(11–12):497–504. (PMID: 19068188) ; Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, Du W, Xu Y (2020) Comparison of endoscopic surgery and lichtenstein repair for treatment of inguinal hernias: a network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 99(6):e19134. (PMID: 3202843910.1097/MD.0000000000019134) ; Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, Garcea G, Ubhi SS, Robertson GS (2007) Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: a new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma. Hernia 11(5):393–396. (PMID: 1754149510.1007/s10029-007-0233-4) ; Köckerling F, Bittner R, Jacob DA, Seidelmann L, Keller T, Adolf D, Kraft B, Kuthe A (2015) TEP versus TAPP: comarison of the perioperative outcome in 17,587 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 29(12):3750–3760. (PMID: 25805239464895610.1007/s00464-015-4150-9) ; Köckerling F, Stechemesser B, Hukauf M, Kuthe A, Schug-Pass C (2016) TEP versus lichtenstein: which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men? Surg Endosc 30(8):3304–3313. (PMID: 2649077110.1007/s00464-015-4603-1) ; Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs lichtenstein and other open meshtechniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomizedcontrolled trials. Surg Endosc 19(2):188–199. (PMID: 1557825010.1007/s00464-004-9126-0) ; Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt C-G (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(5):605–615. (PMID: 1578925510.1007/s00464-004-9049-9) ; Garg P, Rajagopal M, Varghese V, Ismail M (2009) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with nonfixation of the mesh for 1692 hernias. Surg Endosc 23(6):1241–1245. (PMID: 1881399010.1007/s00464-008-0137-0) ; Teng YJ, Pan SM, Liu YL, Yang KH, Zhang YC, Tian JH, Han JX (2011) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials offixation versus nofixation of mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitonealinguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 25(9):2849–2858. (PMID: 2148787310.1007/s00464-011-1668-3) ; Köckerling F, Bittner R, Adolf D, Fortelny R, Niebuhr H, Mayer F, Schug-Pass C (2018) Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (tapp): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures. Surg Endosc 32(5):2222–2231. (PMID: 2907597310.1007/s00464-017-5912-3) ; Bjurstrom MF, Nicol AL, Amid PK, Chen DC (2014) Pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy: current perspectives. J Pain Res 7:277–290. (PMID: 249209344045265) ; Aasvang EK, Gmaehle E, Hansen JB, Gmaehle B, Forman JL, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Kehlet H (2010) Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain. Anesthesiology 112(4):957–969. (PMID: 2023430710.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d31ff8) ; Aasvang E, Kehlat H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95(1):69–76. (PMID: 1553162110.1093/bja/aei019) ; Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89(11):1476–1479. (PMID: 1239039510.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02260.x) ; Bower S, Moore BB, Weiss SM (1996) Neuralgia after inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 62(8):664–667. (PMID: 8712565) ; Wijsmuller AR, Lange JF, Kleinrensink GJ, van Geldere D, Simons MP, Huygen FJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2007) Nerve-identifying inguinal hernia repair: a surgical anatomical study. World J Surg 31(2):414–420. (PMID: 1718056010.1007/s00268-006-0376-y) ; Reinpold W, Schroeder AD, Schroeder M, Berger C, Rohr M, Wehrenberg U (2015) Retroperitoneal anatomy of the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, genitofemoral, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: consequences for prevention and treatment of chronic inguinodynia. Hernia 19(4):539–548. (PMID: 2608239710.1007/s10029-015-1396-z) ; Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G, Izard G, Kehlet H, Wijsmuller AR, Di Miceli D, Doglietto GB (2011) International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia 15(3):239–249. (PMID: 2136528710.1007/s10029-011-0798-9) ; Graham DS, MacQueen IT, Chen DC (2018) Inguinal neuroanatomy: implications for prevention of chronic postinguinal hernia pain. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg 1(1):1–8. (PMID: 10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_6_18) ; Li J, Ji Z, Li Y (2014) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open procedure in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: a metaanalysis of the results. Am J Surg 207(4):602–612. (PMID: 2413967010.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.008) ; Burcharth J, Andresen K, Pommergaard HC, Bisgaard T, Rosenberg J (2014) Direct inguinal hernias and anterior surgical approach are risk factors for female inguinal hernia recurrences. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(1):71–76. (PMID: 2407767610.1007/s00423-013-1124-z) ; Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrøm J, Andersen FH, Wara P, Juul P, Callesen T (2001) Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 358(9288):1124–1128. (PMID: 1159766510.1016/S0140-6736(01)06251-1) ; Schmidt L, Öberg S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J (2018) Recurrence rates after repair of inguinal hernia in women: a systematic review. JAMA Surg 153(12):1135–1142. (PMID: 3038311310.1001/jamasurg.2018.3102) ; Chen J, Lv Y, Shen Y, Wang M (2010) A prospective comparison of preperitoneal tension-free open herniorrhaphy with mesh plug herniorrhaphy for the treatment of femoral hernias. Surgery 148(5):976–981. (PMID: 2035661510.1016/j.surg.2010.02.006) Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Femoral hernia; Laparoscopic technique; Open surgery; Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20221130 Date Completed: 20230411 Latest Revision: 20230412 Update Code: 20231215

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

Comparison of open preperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair for primary unilateral femoral hernia: a retrospective cohort study of 132 case.