Einzeltreffer — DigiBib

Climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies (CCAMS) are changes to the management of production forests motivated by the need to mitigate climate change, or adapt production forests to climate change risks. Sweden is employing CCAMS with unclear implications for biodiversity and forest ecosystem services (ES). Here, we synthesized evidence from 51 published scientific reviews, to evaluate the potential implications for biodiversity and a range of provisioning, regulating, and cultural ES, from the adoption of CCAMS relative to standard forestry practice. The CCAMS assessed were the adoption of (i) mixed-species stands, (ii) continuous cover forestry, (iii) altered rotation lengths, (iv) conversion to introduced tree species, (v) logging residue extraction, (vi) stand fertilization, and (vii) altered ditching/draining practices. We highlight the complexity of biodiversity and ES outcomes, identify knowledge gaps, and emphasize the importance of evidence-based decision making and landscape-scale planning when navigating choices involving the widespread adoption of CCAMS.

Titel:	Climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies for production forests: Trade-offs, synergies, and uncertainties in biodiversity and ecosystem services delivery in Northern Europe.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	Felton, A ; Belyazid, S ; Eggers, J ; Nordström, EM ; Öhman, K
Link:	Full Text Finder (Volltext)
Zeitschrift:	Ambio, Jg. 53 (2024), Heft 1, S. 1-16
Veröffentlichung:	Stockholm : Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences ; <i>Original Publication</i>: Oslo, Universitetsforlaget., 2024
Medientyp:	academicJournal
ISSN:	1654-7209 (electronic)
DOI:	10.1007/s13280-023-01909-1
Schlagwort:	Conservation of Natural Resources Forests Biodiversity Trees Europe Forestry Introduced Species Ecosystem Climate Change
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE Sprachen: English Publication Type: Journal Article; Review Language: English [Ambio] 2024 Jan; Vol. 53 (1), pp. 1-16. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2023 Aug 17. MeSH Terms: Ecosystem* ; Climate Change* ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Forests ; Biodiversity ; Trees ; Europe ; Forestry ; Introduced Species Comments: Erratum in: Ambio. 2023 Sep 19;:. (PMID: 37725250) References: Arnqvist, G., and D. Wooster. 1995. Metaanalysis—synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 236–240. (PMID: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89073-4) ; Backman, F., and E. Mårald. 2016. Is there a Nordic model for the treatment of introduced tree species? A comparison of the use, policy, and debate concerning introduced tree species in the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 31: 222–232. (PMID: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1089929) ; Bauhus, J., D.I. Forrester, B. Gardiner, H. Jactel, R. Vallejo, and H. Pretzsch. 2017. Ecological stability of mixed-species forests. In Mixed-species forests, ed. H. Pretzsch, D.I. Forrester, and J. Bauhus, 337–382. Berlin: Springer. (PMID: 10.1007/978-3-662-54553-9_7) ; Berglund, H., and T. Kuuluvainen. 2021. Representative boreal forest habitats in northern Europe, and a revised model for ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation. Ambio 50: 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01444-3 . (PMID: 10.1007/s13280-020-01444-3) ; Binkley, D., and P. Högberg. 2016. Tamm review: revisiting the influence of nitrogen deposition on Swedish forests. Forest Ecology and Management 368: 222–239. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.035) ; Bouget, C., A. Lassauce, and M. Jonsell. 2012. Effects of fuelwood harvesting on biodiversity—a review focused on the situation in Europe. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 42: 1421–1432. (PMID: 10.1139/x2012-078) ; Cowie, A.L., P. Smith, and D. Johnson. 2006. Does soil carbon loss in biomass production systems negate the greenhouse benefits of bioenergy? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11: 979–1002. (PMID: 10.1007/s11027-006-9030-0) ; de Jong, J., C. Akselsson, G. Egnell, S. Löfgren, and B.A. Olsson. 2017. Realizing the energy potential of forest biomass in Sweden-How much is environmentally sustainable? Forest Ecology and Management 383: 3–16. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.028) ; de Jong, J., and A. Dahlberg. 2017. Impact on species of conservation interest of forest harvesting for bioenergy purposes. Forest Ecology and Management 383: 37–48. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.016) ; Diaz, S., J. Settle, E. Brondizio, H. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, et al. 2019. The global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) - bit.ly/IPBESReport. Bonn, Germany. ; Driscoll, D. A., A. Felton, P. Gibbons, A. M. Felton, N. T. Munro, and D. B. Lindenmayer. 2012. Priorities in policy and management when existing biodiversity stressors interact with climate-change. Climatic Change 111: 533–557. (PMID: 10.1007/s10584-011-0170-1) ; Drössler, L., E. Agestam, K. Bielak, M. Dudzinska, J. Koricheva, M. Liziniewicz, M. Löf, B. Mason, et al. 2018. Over- and underyielding in time and space in experiments with mixed stands of scots pine and Norway spruce. Forests 9: 495. (PMID: 10.3390/f9080495) ; Duncker, P.S., S.M. Barreiro, G.M. Hengeveld, T. Lind, W.L. Mason, S. Ambrozy, and H. Spiecker. 2012. Classification of forest management approaches: a new conceptual framework and its applicability to European forestry. Ecology and Society 17: 51. (PMID: 10.5751/ES-05262-170451) ; Eide, W., K. Ahrné, U. Bjelke, S. Nordström, E. Ottosson, J. Sandström, and S. Sundberg. 2020. Condition and trends for species and their habitat: Redlisted species in Sweden 2020. SLU artdatabanken, Report 24, Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish). ; Ekblad, A., H. Wallander, D.L. Godbold, C. Cruz, D. Johnson, P. Baldrian, R. Björk, D. Epron, et al. 2013. The production and turnover of extramatrical mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi in forest soils: role in carbon cycling. Plant and Soil 366: 1–27. (PMID: 10.1007/s11104-013-1630-3) ; Ekholm, A., L. Lundqvist, E. Petter Axelsson, G. Egnell, J. Hjältén, T. Lundmark, and J. Sjögren. 2023. Long-term yield and biodiversity in stands managed with the selection system and the rotation forestry system: a qualitative review. Forest Ecology and Management 537: 120920. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120920) ; Engelmark, O., K. Sjoberg, B. Andersson, O. Rosvall, G.I. Agren, W.L. Baker, P. Barklund, C. Bjorkman, et al. 2001. Ecological effects and management aspects of an exotic tree species: the case of lodgepole pine in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 141: 3–13. (PMID: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00498-9) ; FAO. 2020. Global Forest Resources Assessment: Main report. Rome. ; Faustmann, M. 1849. Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry. Allgemeine Forst-Und Jagd-Zeitung 15: 7–44 (In German). ; Felipe-Lucia, M.R., S. Soliveres, C. Penone, P. Manning, F. van der Plas, S. Boch, D. Prati, C. Ammer, et al. 2018. Multiple forest attributes underpin the supply of multiple ecosystem services. Nature Communications 9: 4839. (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-018-07082-4) ; Felton, A., J. Boberg, C. Björkman, and O. Widenfalk. 2013. Identifying and managing the ecological risks of using introduced tree species in Sweden’s production forestry. Forest Ecology and Management 307: 165–177. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.059) ; Felton, A., L. Ellingson, E. Andersson, L. Drössler, and K. Blennow. 2010a. Adapting production forests in southern Sweden to climate change: constraints and opportunities for risk spreading. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. ; Felton, A., A.M. Felton, H.K. Wam, J. Witzell, M. Wallgren, M. Löf, J. Sonesson, M. Lindbladh, et al. 2022. Forest biodiversity and ecosystem services from spruce-birch mixtures: the potential importance of tree spatial arrangement. Environmental Challenges 6: 100407. (PMID: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100407) ; Felton, A., L. Gustafsson, J.M. Roberge, T. Ranius, J. Hjältén, J. Rudolphi, M. Lindbladh, J. Weslien, et al. 2016a. How climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies can threaten or enhance the biodiversity of production forests: insights from Sweden. Biological Conservation 194: 11–20. (PMID: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.030) ; Felton, A., M. Lindbladh, J. Brunet, and O. Fritz. 2010b. Replacing coniferous monocultures with mixed-species production stands: an assessment of the potential benefits for forest biodiversity in northern Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 939–947. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.011) ; Felton, A., U. Nilsson, J. Sonesson, A.M. Felton, J.M. Roberge, T. Ranius, M. Ahlström, J. Bergh, et al. 2016b. Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden. Ambio 45: 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0749-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s13280-015-0749-2) ; Felton, A., L. Petersson, O. Nilsson, J. Witzell, M. Cleary, A.M. Felton, C. Björkman, Å.O. Sang, et al. 2020. The tree species matters: biodiversity and ecosystem service implications of replacing Scots pine production stands with Norway spruce. Ambio 49: 1035–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01259-x . (PMID: 10.1007/s13280-019-01259-x) ; Fog, K. 1988. The effect of added nitrogen on the rate of decomposition of organic matter. Biological Reviews 63: 433–462. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1988.tb00725.x) ; Forest Europe. 2020. State of Europe's Forests 2020. Forest Europe, Bratislava, Slovakia. ; Gamfeldt, L., T. Snäll, R. Bagchi, M. Jonsson, L. Gustafsson, P. Kjellander, M.C. Ruiz-Jaen, M. Fröberg, et al. 2013. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature Communications 4: 1340. (PMID: 10.1038/ncomms2328) ; Girona, M. M., H. Morin, S. Gauthier, and Y. Bergeron. 2023. Boreal forests in the face of climate change: sustainable management. Springer, Be. ; Gundersen, V.S., and L.H. Frivold. 2008. Public preferences for forest structures: a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7: 241–258. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.05.001) ; Hahn, T., J. Eggers, N. Subramanian, A. Toraño Caicoya, E. Uhl, and T. Snäll. 2021. Specified resilience value of alternative forest management adaptations to storms. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 36: 585–597. (PMID: 10.1080/02827581.2021.1988140) ; Harnesk, D. 2022. The decreasing availability of reindeer forage in boreal forests during snow cover periods: a Sámi pastoral landscape perspective in Sweden. Ambio 51: 2508–2523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01752-w . (PMID: 10.1007/s13280-022-01752-w) ; Harris, N.L., D.A. Gibbs, A. Baccini, R.A. Birdsey, S. De Bruin, M. Farina, L. Fatoyinbo, M.C. Hansen, et al. 2021. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nature Climate Change 11: 234–240. (PMID: 10.1038/s41558-020-00976-6) ; Heck, V., D. Gerten, W. Lucht, and A. Popp. 2018. Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries. Nature Climate Change 8: 151. (PMID: 10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y) ; Hedwall, P.-O., P. Gong, M. Ingerslev, and J. Bergh. 2014. Fertilization in northern forests–biological, economic and environmental constraints and possibilities. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29: 301–311. (PMID: 10.1080/02827581.2014.926096) ; Hedwall, P.-O., E. Holmström, M. Lindbladh, and A. Felton. 2019. Concealed by darkness: how stand density can override the biodiversity benefits of mixed forests. Ecosphere 10: e02835. (PMID: 10.1002/ecs2.2835) ; Hensgens, G., H. Laudon, M. Peichl, I.A. Gil, Q. Zhou, and M. Berggren. 2020. The role of the understory in litter DOC and nutrient leaching in boreal forests. Biogeochemistry 149: 87–103. (PMID: 10.1007/s10533-020-00668-5) ; Hume, A.M., H.Y.H. Chen, and A.R. Taylor. 2018. Intensive forest harvesting increases susceptibility of northern forest soils to carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus loss. Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 246–255. (PMID: 10.1111/1365-2664.12942) ; Huuskonen, S., T. Domisch, L. Finer, J. Hantula, J. Hynynen, J. Matala, J. Miina, S. Neuvonen, et al. 2021. What is the potential for replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands to enhance ecosystem services in boreal forests in Fennoscandia? Forest Ecology and Management 479: 118558. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118558) ; Hynynen, J., P. Niemisto, A. Vihera-Aarnio, A. Brunner, S. Hein, and P. Velling. 2010. Silviculture of birch (Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrh.) in northern Europe. Forestry 83: 103–119. (PMID: 10.1093/forestry/cpp035) ; IPCC. 2022. Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ; IUCN. 2017. The IUCN red list of threatened species. International Union for Conservation of Nature. ; Jactel, H., J. Bauhus, J. Boberg, D. Bonal, B. Castagneyrol, B. Gardiner, J.R. Gonzalez-Olabarria, J. Koricheva, et al. 2017. Tree diversity drives forest stand resistance to natural disturbances. Current Forestry Reports 3: 223–243. (PMID: 10.1007/s40725-017-0064-1) ; Jandl, R., M. Lindner, L. Vesterdal, B. Bauwens, R. Baritz, F. Hagedorn, D.W. Johnson, K. Minkkinen, et al. 2007. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137: 253–268. (PMID: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003) ; Johansson, T., J. Hjältén, J. de Jong, and H. von Stedingk. 2013. Environmental considerations from legislation and certification in managed forest stands: a review of their importance for biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management 303: 98–112. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.012) ; Jonczak, J., U. Jankiewicz, M. Kondras, B. Kruczkowska, L. Oktaba, J. Oktaba, I. Olejniczak, E. Pawlowicz, et al. 2020. The influence of birch trees (Betula spp.) on soil environment—a review. Forest Ecology and Management 477: 118486. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118486) ; Juvany, L., P. Hedwall, A. Felton, Ö. K. M. Wallgren, K. Christer, J. Anders, J. Henrik, et al. 2023. From simple metrics to cervid forage: improving predictions of ericaceous shrub biomass. Forest Ecology and Management 544: 121120. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121120) ; Kallio, T., R. Häkkinen, and J. Heinonen. 1985. An outbreak of Gremmeniella abietina in central Finland. European Journal of Forest Pathology 15: 216–223. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1985.tb00888.x) ; Karlman, M. 2001. Risks associated with the introduction of Pinus contorta in northern Sweden with respect to pathogens. Forest Ecology and Management 141: 97–105. (PMID: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00492-8) ; Kivinen, S., J. Moen, A. Berg, and Å. Eriksson. 2010. Effects of modern forest management on winter grazing resources for reindeer in Sweden. Ambio 39: 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0044-1 . (PMID: 10.1007/s13280-010-0044-1) ; Kjær, E.D., A. Lobo, and T. Myking. 2014. The role of exotic tree species in Nordic forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29: 323–332. (PMID: 10.1080/02827581.2014.926098) ; Kuuluvainen, T., O. Tahvonen, and T. Aakala. 2012. Even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in boreal Fennoscandia: a review. Ambio 41: 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0289-y . (PMID: 10.1007/s13280-012-0289-y) ; Kytö, M., P. Niemelä, and S. Larsson. 1996. Insects on trees: population and individual response to fertilization. Oikos 75: 148–159. (PMID: 10.2307/3546238) ; Laiho, O., E. Lähde, and T. Pukkala. 2011. Uneven-vs even-aged management in Finnish boreal forests. Forestry 84: 547–556. (PMID: 10.1093/forestry/cpr032) ; Lassauce, A., Y. Paillet, H. Jactel, and C. Bouget. 2011. Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms. Ecological Indicators 11: 1027–1039. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.004) ; Levers, C., P.J. Verkerk, D. Müller, P.H. Verburg, V. Butsic, P.J. Leitão, M. Lindner, and T. Kuemmerle. 2014. Drivers of forest harvesting intensity patterns in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 315: 160–172. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.030) ; Lindahl, K.B., A. Sténs, C. Sandström, J. Johansson, R. Lidskog, T. Ranius, and J.-M. Roberge. 2017. The Swedish forestry model: more of everything? Forest Policy and Economics 77: 44–55. (PMID: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.012) ; Lindelöw, A., and C. Björkman. 2001. Insects on lodgepole pine in Sweden—current knowledge and potential risks. Forest Ecology and Management 141: 107–116. (PMID: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00494-1) ; Lindenmayer, B.D., and J.F. Franklin. 2002. Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Washington: Island Press. ; Lindenmayer, D. B., K. B. Hulvey, R. J. Hobbs, M. Colyvan, A. Felton, H. Possingham, W. Steffen, K. Wilson, et al. 2012. Avoiding bio-perversity from carbon sequestration solutions. Conservation Letters 5: 28–36. ; Lindhagen, A., and G. Bladh. 2013. Trends in berry and mushroom picking—an example of how quantitative and qualitative methods can be combined. Naturvårdsverket, Report 6547, Stockholm, Sweden (In Swedish, English summary). ; Lodin, I., V. Brukas, and I. Wallin. 2017. Spruce or not? Contextual and attitudinal drivers behind the choice of tree species in southern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics 83: 191–198. (PMID: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.11.010) ; Lundqvist, L. 2017. Tamm review: selection system reduces long-term volume growth in Fennoscandic uneven-aged Norway spruce forests. Forest Ecology and Management 391: 362–375. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.011) ; Maljanen, M., B. Sigurdsson, J. Guðmundsson, H. Óskarsson, J. Huttunen, and P. Martikainen. 2010. Greenhouse gas balances of managed peatlands in the Nordic countries–present knowledge and gaps. Biogeosciences 7: 2711–2738. (PMID: 10.5194/bg-7-2711-2010) ; Månsson, J., C. Kalen, P. Kjellander, H. Andren, and H. Smith. 2007. Quantitative estimates of tree species selectivity by moose (Alces alces) in a forest landscape. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 22: 407–414. (PMID: 10.1080/02827580701515023) ; Mason, W. 2002. Are irregular stands more windfirm? Forestry 75: 347–355. (PMID: 10.1093/forestry/75.4.347) ; Mayer, M., C.E. Prescott, W.E. Abaker, L. Augusto, L. Cécillon, G.W. Ferreira, J. James, R. Jandl, et al. 2020. Influence of forest management activities on soil organic carbon stocks: a knowledge synthesis. Forest Ecology and Management 466: 118127. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118127) ; Messier, C., J. Bauhus, R. Sousa‐Silva, H. Auge, L. Baeten, N. Barsoum, H. Bruelheide, B. Caldwell, et al. 2021. For the sake of resilience and multifunctionality, let's diversify planted forests! Conservation Letters e12829. ; Michanek, G., G. Bostedt, H. Ekvall, M. Forsberg, A. Hof, J. de Jong, J. Rudolphi, and A. Zabel. 2018. Landscape planning—paving the way for effective conservation of forest biodiversity and a diverse forestry? Forests 9: 523. (PMID: 10.3390/f9090523) ; Nave, L., E. Vance, C. Swanston, and P. Curtis. 2009. Impacts of elevated N inputs on north temperate forest soil C storage, C/N, and net N-mineralization. Geoderma 153: 231–240. (PMID: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.08.012) ; Nevalainen, S. 2017. Comparison of damage risks in even-and uneven-aged forestry in Finland. Silva Fennica 51. ; Nieminen, M., H. Hokka, R. Laiho, A. Juutinen, A. Ahtikoski, M. Pearson, S. Kojola, S. Sarkkola, et al. 2018. Could continuous cover forestry be an economically and environmentally feasible management option on drained boreal peatlands? Forest Ecology and Management 424: 78–84. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.046) ; Nieminen, M., S. Sarkkola, and A. Laurén. 2017. Impacts of forest harvesting on nutrient, sediment and dissolved organic carbon exports from drained peatlands: a literature review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Forest Ecology and Management 392: 13–20. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.046) ; Nohrstedt, H.O. 2001. Response of coniferous forest ecosystems on mineral soils to nutrient additions: a review of Swedish experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 16: 555–573. (PMID: 10.1080/02827580152699385) ; Orsi, F., M. Ciolli, E. Primmer, L. Varumo, and D. Geneletti. 2020. Mapping hotspots and bundles of forest ecosystem services across the European Union. Land Use Policy 99: 104840. (PMID: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104840) ; Payn, T., J.-M. Carnus, P. Freer-Smith, M. Kimberley, W. Kollert, S. Liu, C. Orazio, L. Rodriguez, et al. 2015. Changes in planted forests and future global implications. Forest Ecology and Management 352: 57–67. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.021) ; Persson, T., and G. Egnell. 2018. Stump harvesting for bioenergy: a review of climatic and environmental impacts in northern Europe and America. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment 7. ; Pilli, R., R. Alkama, A. Cescatti, W.A. Kurz, and G. Grassi. 2022. The European forest Carbon budget under future climate conditions and current management practices. Biogeosciences 19: 3263–3284. (PMID: 10.5194/bg-19-3263-2022) ; Pommerening, A., and S. Murphy. 2004. A review of the history, definitions and methods of continuous cover forestry with special attention to afforestation and restocking. Forestry 77: 27–44. (PMID: 10.1093/forestry/77.1.27) ; Potschin, M., R. Haines-Young, R. Fish, and R.K. Turner. 2016. Routledge handbook of ecosystem services. Abingdon: Routledge. (PMID: 10.4324/9781315775302) ; Puettmann, K.J., S.M. Wilson, S.C. Baker, P.J. Donoso, L. Drössler, G. Amente, B.D. Harvey, T. Knoke, et al. 2015. Silvicultural alternatives to conventional even-aged forest management-what limits global adoption? Forest Ecosystems 2: 1–16. (PMID: 10.1186/s40663-015-0031-x) ; Pukkala, T., O. Laiho, and E. Lähde. 2016. Continuous cover management reduces wind damage. Forest Ecology and Management 372: 120–127. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.014) ; Ranius, T., A. Caruso, M. Jonsell, A. Juutinen, G. Thor, and J. Rudolphi. 2014. Dead wood creation to compensate for habitat loss from intensive forestry. Biological Conservation 169: 277–284. (PMID: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.029) ; Ranius, T., A. Hämäläinen, G. Egnell, B. Olsson, K. Eklöf, J. Stendahl, J. Rudolphi, A. Sténs, et al. 2018. The effects of logging residue extraction for energy on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a synthesis. Journal of Environmental Management 209: 409–425. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.048) ; Ranius, T., L.A. Widenfalk, M. Seedre, L. Lindman, A. Felton, A. Hämäläinen, A. Filyushkina, and E. Öckinger. 2023. Protected area designation and management in a world of climate change: a review of recommendations. Ambio 52: 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01779-z . (PMID: 10.1007/s13280-022-01779-z) ; Raymond, P., M. Löf, P. Comeau, L. Rytter, M.M. Girona, and K.J. Puettmann. 2023. Silviculture of mixed-species and structurally complex boreal stands. In Boreal forests in the face of climate change: sustainable management, ed. M.M. Girona, M.H. Morin, S. Gauthier, and Y. Bergeron, 403–416. Berlin: Springer. (PMID: 10.1007/978-3-031-15988-6_15) ; Roberge, J.-M., H. Laudon, C. Björkman, T. Ranius, C. Sandström, A. Felton, A. Sténs, A. Nordin, et al. 2016. Socio-ecological implications of modifying rotation lengths in forestry. Ambio 45: 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0747-4 . (PMID: 10.1007/s13280-015-0747-4) ; Rosenthal, R. 1979. The “file drawer” problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86: 185–193. (PMID: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638) ; Rytter, L., M. Ingerslev, A. Kilpeläinen, P. Torssonen, D. Lazdina, M. Löf, P. Madsen, P. Muiste, et al. 2016. Increased forest biomass production in the Nordic and Baltic countries–a review on current and future opportunities. Silva Fennica 50: 1–33. (PMID: 10.14214/sf.1660) ; Saarsalmi, A., and E. Mälkönen. 2001. Forest fertilization research in Finland: a literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 16: 514–535. (PMID: 10.1080/02827580152699358) ; Savilaakso, S., A. Johansson, M. Hakkila, A. Uusitalo, T. Sandgren, M. Monkkonen, and P. Puttonen. 2021. What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review. Environmental Evidence 10: 1–38. (PMID: 10.1186/s13750-020-00215-7) ; Seidl, R., K. Albrich, D. Thom, and W. Rammer. 2018. Harnessing landscape heterogeneity for managing future disturbance risks in forest ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Management 209: 46–56. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.014) ; Seidl, R., M.-J. Schelhaas, W. Rammer, and P.J. Verkerk. 2014. Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nature Clim: Change advance online publication. (PMID: 10.1038/nclimate2318) ; Seidl, R., D. Thom, M. Kautz, D. Martin-Benito, M. Peltoniemi, G. Vacchiano, J. Wild, D. Ascoli, et al. 2017. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nature Climate Change 7: 395–402. (PMID: 10.1038/nclimate3303) ; Senf, C., A. Buras, C.S. Zang, A. Rammig, and R. Seidl. 2020. Excess forest mortality is consistently linked to drought across Europe. Nature Communications 11: 1–8. (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-020-19924-1) ; SEPA. 2022. The environmental goals—annual follow-up of Sweden's national environmental goals 2022—with a focus on government efforts. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm. (in Swedish, English summary). ; SFA. 2018. Production increase measures: report from a cooperative process on forest production/Produktionshöjande åtgärder Rapport från samverkansprocess skogsproduktion. Page 68 in O. Falkeström, Å. Granqvist, T. Höijer, F. Prescher, T. Thuresson, and L.-E. Wigert, editors. Report 2018/1. Skogsstyrelsen, https://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/globalassets/om-oss/publikationer/2018/rapport-20181-produktionshojande-atgarder.pdf . ; SFIF. 2018. Facts & figures. Swedish Forest Industry Federation, http://www.forestindustries.se/forest-industry/facts-and-figures/ . ; Simmonds, M. 2015. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots. Systematic Reviews 4: 24. (PMID: 10.1186/s13643-015-0004-8) ; Statistics Sweden. 2020. Formally protected forest land, voluntary set-asides, consideration patches and unproductive forest land SCB. https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/environment/land-use/formally-protected-forest-land-voluntary-set-asides-consideration-patches-and-unproductive-forest-land/ . ; Subramanian, N., J. Bergh, U. Johansson, U. Nilsson, and O. Sallnäs. 2016. Adaptation of forest management regimes in southern Sweden to increased risks associated with climate change. Forests 7: 8. (PMID: 10.3390/f7010008) ; Sullivan, T.P., and D.S. Sullivan. 2018. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on abundance and diversity of plants and animals in temperate and boreal forests. Environmental Reviews 26: 26–42. (PMID: 10.1139/er-2017-0026) ; Thiffault, E., K.D. Hannam, D. Paré, B.D. Titus, P.W. Hazlett, D.G. Maynard, and S. Brais. 2011. Effects of forest biomass harvesting on soil productivity in boreal and temperate forests—a review. Environmental Reviews 19: 278–309. (PMID: 10.1139/a11-009) ; Tolkkinen, M.J., J. Heino, S.H. Ahonen, K. Lehosmaa, and H. Mykrä. 2020. Streams and riparian forests depend on each other: a review with a special focus on microbes. Forest Ecology and Management 462: 117962. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117962) ; Treseder, K.K. 2008. Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecology Letters 11: 1111–1120. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01230.x) ; Trettin, C.C., M.F. Jurgensen, M.R. Gale, and J.W. McLaughlin. 1995. Soil carbon in northern forested wetlands: impacts of silvicultural practices. Carbon Forms and Functions in Forest Soils. https://doi.org/10.2136/1995.carbonforms.c20 . (PMID: 10.2136/1995.carbonforms.c20) ; Triviño, M., M. Potterf, J. Tijerín, P. Ruiz-Benito, D. Burgas, K. Eyvindson, C. Blattert, M. Mönkkönen, et al. 2023. Enhancing resilience of boreal forests through management under global change: a review. Current Landscape Ecology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-023-00088-9 . (PMID: 10.1007/s40823-023-00088-9) ; Ulmanen, J., Å. G. Swartling, and O. Wallgren. 2012. Climate change adaptation in Swedish Forestry Policy: a historical overview, 1990–2010. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm. ; Valinger, E., and J. Fridman. 2011. Factors affecting the probability of windthrow at stand level as a result of Gudrun winter storm in southern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 262: 398–403. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.004) ; Vasaitis, R., J. Stenlid, I.M. Thomsen, P. Barklund, and A. Dahlberg. 2008. Stump removal to control root rot in forest stands. A Literature Study. Silva Fennica 42: 457. ; Wall, A. 2012. Risk analysis of effects of whole-tree harvesting on site productivity. Forest Ecology and Management 282: 175–184. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.012) ; Wallgren, M., R. Bergström, G. Bergqvist, and M. Olsson. 2013. Spatial distribution of browsing and tree damage by moose in young pine forests, with implications for the forest industry. Forest Ecology and Management 305: 229–238. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.057) ; Warman, R.D. 2014. Global wood production from natural forests has peaked. Biodiversity and Conservation 23: 1063–1078. (PMID: 10.1007/s10531-014-0633-6) Grant Information: 2021-02132 Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; 2019-02007 Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Biodiversity crisis; Climate mitigation; Ecosystem services; Forest adaptation; Forest conservation; Forest resilience Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20230817 Date Completed: 20231204 Latest Revision: 20240320 Update Code: 20240320 PubMed Central ID: PMC10692060

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

Climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies for production forests: Trade-offs, synergies, and uncertainties in biodiversity and ecosystem services delivery in Northern Europe.