| Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review; Journal Article; Review
- Language: English
- [Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc] 2023 Dec; Vol. 31 (12), pp. 5365-5380. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2023 Sep 25.
- MeSH Terms: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee* ; Knee Prosthesis* ; Humans ; Survivorship ; Prosthesis Design ; Knee Joint / surgery ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Prosthesis Failure
- References: Vasso M, Beaufils P, Schiavone Panni A (2013) Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37(7):1279–1284. (PMID: 237002513685670) ; Sanz-Ruiz P, León-Román VE, Matas-Diez JA, Villanueva-Martínez M, Vaquero J (2022) Long-term outcomes of one single-design varus valgus constrained versus one single-design rotating hinge in revision knee arthroplasty after over 10-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 17(1):135. (PMID: 352461828896104) ; Ye CY, Xue DT, Jiang S, He RX (2016) Results of a second-generation constrained condylar prosthesis in complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: A mean 5.5-year follow-up. Chin Med J 129(11):1334–1339. (PMID: 272311724894045) ; Gudnason A, Milbrink J, Hailer NP (2011) Implant survival and outcome after rotating-hinge total knee revision arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(11):1601–1607. (PMID: 21656196) ; Miralles-Muñoz FA, Pineda-Salazar M, Rubio-Morales M, González-Parreño S, Ruiz-Lozano M, Lizaur-Utrilla A (2022) Similar outcomes of constrained condylar knee and rotating hinge prosthesis in revision surgery for extension instability after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol: Surg Res 108(8):103265. (PMID: 35257946) ; Yoon JR, Cheong JY, Im JT, Park PS, Park JO, Shin YS (2019) Rotating hinge knee versus constrained condylar knee in revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 14(3):e0214279. (PMID: 309085386433230) ; Andreani L, Pianigiani S, Bori E, Lisanti M, Innocenti B (2020) Analysis of biomechanical differences between condylar constrained knee and rotating hinged implants: a numerical study. J Arthroplasty 35(1):278–284. (PMID: 31473061) ; Arnholdt J, Boelch SP, Dogan F, Hoberg M, Holzapfel BM, Rudert M (2020) Revision arthroplasty with rotating hinge systems for total knee arthroplasty instability. Oper Orthop Traumatol 32(4):298–308. (PMID: 32472245) ; Barnoud W, Schmidt A, Swan J, Sappey-Marinier E, Batailler C, Servien E, Lustig S (2021) Condylar constrained knee prosthesis and rotating hinge prosthesis for revision total knee arthroplasty for mechanical failure have not the same indications and same results. SICOT. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021046. (PMID: 10.1051/sicotj/2021046) ; Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:71. ; Johnson N, Phillips M (2018) Rayyan for systematic reviews. J Electron Resour Librariansh 30(1):46–48. ; Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716. (PMID: 12956787) ; Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN (2012) The new knee society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):3–19. (PMID: 22045067) ; Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale, of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14. ; Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J (2013) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today-has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty 29(9):1774–1778. ; Fuchs S, Sandmann C, Gerdemann G, Skwara A, Tibesku CO, Bottner F (2004) Quality of life and clinical outcome in salvage revision total knee replacement: Hinged vs. total condylar design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(2):140–143. (PMID: 12937894) ; Hommel H, Wilke K, Kunze D, Hommel P, Fennema P (2017) Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial assessing the effect of level of constraint on postoperative outcome. BMJ Open 7(3):e012964. (PMID: 283481825372033) ; Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS (2010) Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 468(5):1221–1228. (PMID: 200581122853653) ; Luttjeboer JS, Bénard MR, Defoort KC, van Hellemondt GG, Wymenga AB (2016) Revision total knee arthroplasty for instability—outcome for different types of instability and implants. J Arthroplasty 31(12):2672–2676. (PMID: 27546470) ; Malcolm TL, Bederman SS, Schwarzkopf R (2016) Outcomes of varus valgus constrained versus rotating-hinge implants in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 39(1):e140–e148. (PMID: 26730689) ; Shen C, Lichstein PM, Austin MS, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J (2014) Revision knee arthroplasty for bone loss: choosing the right degree of constraint. J Arthroplasty 29(1):127–131. (PMID: 23743510) ; Xu J, von Fritsch L, Sabah SA, Price AJ, Alvand A (2022) Implant survivorship, functional outcomes and complications with the use of rotating hinge knee implants: a systematic review. Knee Surg Relat Res 34(1):9. (PMID: 352462788896150) ; Samiezadeh S, Bougherara H, Abolghasemian M, D’Lima D, Backstein D (2019) Rotating hinge knee causes lower bone–implant interface stress compared to constrained condylar knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(4):1224–1231. (PMID: 30039293) ; León-Román VE, García-Mato D, López-Torres II, Vaquero-Martín FJ, Calvo-Haro JA, Pascau J, Sanz-Ruíz P (2021) The knee prosthesis constraint dilemma: Biomechanical comparison between varus-valgus constrained implants and rotating hinge prosthesis. A cadaver study J Orthop Res 39(7):1533–1539. (PMID: 32881027) ; Lee DH, Lee SH, Song EK, Seon JK, Lim HA, Yang HY (2017) Causes and clinical outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 29(2):104–109. (PMID: 285451745450576) ; Pasquier G, Ehlinger M, Mainard D (2019) The role of rotating hinge implants in revision total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 4(6):269–278. (PMID: 312109686549216) ; Zhang J, Li E, Zhang Y (2022) Prostheses option in revision total knee arthroplasty, from the bench to the bedside: (1) basic science and principles. EFORT Open Rev 7(2):174–187. (PMID: 351925098897564) ; Böhler C, Kolbitsch P, Schuh R, Lass R, Kubista B, Giurea A (2017) Midterm results of a new rotating hinge knee implant: a 5-year follow-up. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7532745. (PMID: 10.1155/2017/7532745293760755742428) ; Hermans K, Vandenneucker H, Truijen J, Oosterbosch J, Bellemans J (2019) Hinged versus CCK revision arthroplasty for the stiff total knee. Knee 26(1):222–227. (PMID: 30415974) ; van Rensch PJH, Heesterbeek PJC, Hannink G, van Hellemondt GG, Wymenga AB (2019) Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(4):1043–1048. (PMID: 30367195) ; Bingham JS, Bukowski BR, Wyles CC, Pareek A, Berry DJ, Abdel MP (2019) Rotating-hinge revision total knee arthroplasty for treatment of severe arthrofibrosis. J Arthroplasty 34(7):S271–S276. (PMID: 30819621) ; Byttebier P, Dhont T, Pintelon S, Rajgopal A, Burssens A, Victor J (2022) Comparison of different strategies in revision arthroplasty of the knee with severe bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. J Arthroplasty 37(6):S371–S381. (PMID: 35271982) ; Brown LR, Clement ND, MacDonald DJ, Breusch SJ (2019) The survivorship of the link endo-rotational hinge total knee arthroplasty: 5–12-year follow-up of 100 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(1):107–112. (PMID: 30413941) ; Crawford DA, Berend KR, Morris MJ, Adams JB, Lombardi AV (2017) Results of a modular revision system in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(9):2792–2798. (PMID: 28502536) ; Gil-Martínez P, Sanz P, López-Torres I, Arnal-Burró J, Chana F, Vaquero J (2016) Influence of the cause of the revision on the outcome after revision knee arthroplasty with condylar constrained implant. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 60(3):184–191. (PMID: 26968375) ; Giurea A, Neuhaus HJ, Miehlke R, Schuh R, Lass R, Kubista B, Windhager R (2014) Early results of a new rotating hinge knee implant. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/948520. (PMID: 10.1155/2014/948520250892794095738) ; Gurel R, Morgan S, Elbaz E, Snir N, Gold A, Warschawski Y (2021) Good clinical and radiological outcomes of the varus-valgus constrained mobile-bearing implant in revision total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 45(5):1199–1204. (PMID: 33733283) ; Gwam CU, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Mohamed N, Elmallah RK, Malkani AL, Mont MA (2017) Short-to-midterm outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty patients with a total stabilizer knee system. J Arthroplasty 32(8):2480–2483. (PMID: 28366313) ; Hannon CP, Kruckeberg BM, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Pagnano MW, Abdel MP (2022) Treatment of flexion instability after primary total knee arthroplasty: operative and nonoperative management of 218 cases. J Arthroplasty 37(6S):S333–S341. (PMID: 35218910) ; Hernandez NM, Hinton ZW, Wu CJ, Wellman SS, Jiranek WA, Seyler TM (2021) Varus-valgus constrained implants in revision total knee arthroplasty: mean clinical follow-up of six years. J Arthroplasty 36(7):S303–S307. (PMID: 33558046) ; von Hintze J, Niemeläinen M, Sintonen H, Nieminen J, Eskelinen A (2021) Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):336. ; Hwang SC, Kong JY, Nam DC, Kim DH, Bin PH, Jeong ST, Cho SH (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: A minimum 2-year follow-up analysis. Clin Orthop Surg 2(2):112–120. (PMID: 205142692867196) ; Joshi N, Navarro-Quilis A (2008) Is there a place for rotating-hinge arthroplasty in knee revision surgery for aseptic loosening? J Arthroplasty 23(8):1204–1211. (PMID: 18534467) ; Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Oh HK (2015) Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 30(10):1804–1809. (PMID: 25953383) ; Kunze KN, Akram F, Fuller BC, Choi J, Sporer SM, Levine BR (2019) Superior survivorship for posterior stabilized versus constrained condylar articulations after revision total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective, comparative analysis at short-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty 34(12):3012-3017.e1. (PMID: 31378508) ; Limberg AK, Tibbo ME, Pagnano MW, Perry KI, Hanssen AD, Abdel MP (2020) Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review. Bone Joint J 102(4):458–462. (PMID: 32228079) ; Luque R, Rizo B, Urda A, Garcia-Crespo R, Moro E, Marco F, López-Duran L (2014) Predictive factors for failure after total knee replacement revision. Int Orthop 38(2):429–435. (PMID: 244025573923955) ; Neumann DRP, Hofstaedter T, Dorn U (2012) Follow-up of a modular rotating hinge knee system in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(5):814–819. (PMID: 22000574) ; Pradhan NR, Bale L, Kay P, Porter ML (2004) Salvage revision total knee replacement using the Endo-Model® rotating hinge prosthesis. Knee 11(6):469–473. (PMID: 15581766) ; Reina N, Salib CG, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Abdel MP, Berry DJ (2020) Varus-valgus constrained implants with a mobile-bearing articulation: results of 367 revision total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 35(4):1060–1063. (PMID: 31826835) ; van Rensch PJH, Hannink G, Heesterbeek PJC, Wymenga AB, van Hellemondt GG (2020) Long-term outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty is associated with indication for revision. J Arthroplasty 35(6):1671–1677. (PMID: 32070659) ; Rodriguez JA, Shahane S, Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS (2003) Does the total condylar 3 constrained knee prosthesis predispose to failure of revision total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(4):153–156. (PMID: 14652408) ; Stevens JM, Clement ND, MacDonald D, Hamilton DF, Burnett R (2019) Survival and functional outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with a total stabilizer knee system: minimum 5 years of follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(7):1511–1517. (PMID: 31129718) ; Theil C, Schwarze J, Gosheger G, Poggenpohl L, Ackmann T, Moellenbeck B, Schmidt-Braekling T, Ahrens H (2021) Good to excellent long-term survival of a single-design condylar constrained knee arthroplasty for primary and revision surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30(9):3184–3190. (PMID: 341252559418349) ; Wignadasan W, Chang JS, Kayani B, Kontoghiorghe C, Haddad FS (2021) Long-term results of revision total knee arthroplasty using a rotating hinge implant. Knee 28:72–80. (PMID: 33310668) ; Wilke BK, Wagner ER, Trousdale RT (2014) Long-term survival of semi-constrained total knee arthroplasty for revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 29(5):1005–1008. (PMID: 24393376) ; Rajgopal A, Agrawal U (2020) Long term results of rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in complex primary and revision cases. Acta Orthop Belg 86(3):114–123. ; Matar HE, Bloch BV, James PJ (2022) High ten-year implant survivorship and low patellofemoral complication rate for S-ROM rotating-hinge implants in revision total knee arthroplasty. BJO 3(3):205–210. (PMID: 352749928965783)
- Grant Information: TBM project- T001620N Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Condylar constrained knee; Meta-analysis; PROMs; Revision total knee arthroplasty; Rotating hinged knee
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20230925 Date Completed: 20231216 Latest Revision: 20231216
- Update Code: 20231217
|
