| Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article
- Language: English
- [Environ Sci Pollut Res Int] 2024 Mar; Vol. 31 (14), pp. 21471-21487. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2024 Feb 23.
- MeSH Terms: Conservation of Natural Resources* ; Carbon Dioxide* / analysis ; Economic Development ; Environmental Policy ; China
- References: Afionis S, Sakai M, Scott K, Barrett J, Gouldson A (2017) Consumption-based carbon accounting: does it have a future? Wiley Interdiscip Rev-Clim Chang 8(1):e438. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.438. (PMID: 10.1002/wcc.438) ; Aşıcı AA, Acar S (2016) Does income growth relocate ecological footprint? Ecol Indic 61:707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.022. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.022) ; Banerjee S, Khan MA, Ul Husnain MI (2021) Searching appropriate system boundary for accounting India’s emission inventory for the responsibility to reduce carbon emissions. J Environ Manage 295:112907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112907. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11290734157542) ; Cai X, Che X, Zhu B, Zhao J, Xie R (2018) Will developing countries become pollution havens for developed countries? An empirical investigation in the Belt and Road. J Clean Prod 198:624–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.291. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.291) ; Chakravarty D (2019) Critiquing the weaker version of the environmental Kuznets curve: a consumption-based EKC analysis using dynamic panel data model. Int J Environ Sust 15(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1077/CGP/v15i01/1-18. (PMID: 10.18848/2325-1077/CGP/v15i01/1-18) ; Chen J, Yuan R, Zheng S (2023) Decoupling and scenario analysis of economy-emissions pattern in China’s 30 provinces. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(7):19477–19494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23466-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-022-23466-y) ; Cotta B, Coenen J, Challies E, Newig J, Lenschow A, Schilling-Vacaflor A (2022) Environmental governance in globally telecoupled systems: mapping the terrain towards an integrated research agenda. Earth Syst Gov 13:100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2022.100142. (PMID: 10.1016/j.esg.2022.100142) ; Dietzenbacher E, Cazcarro I, Arto I (2020) Towards a more effective climate policy on international trade. Nat Commun 11(1):1130. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14837-5. (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-020-14837-5321118497048780) ; Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006) ; Duus-Otterström G, Hjorthen FD (2019) Consumption-based emissions accounting: the normative debate. Environ Polit 28(5):866–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1507467. (PMID: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1507467) ; Frodyma K, Papież M, Śmiech S (2022) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in the European Union countries. Energy 241:122899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122899. (PMID: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122899) ; Gill AR, Viswanathan KK, Hassan S (2018) The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) and the environmental problem of the day. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:1636–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.247. (PMID: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.247) ; Hao Y, Huang Z, Wu H (2019) Do carbon emissions and economic growth decouple in China? An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. Energies 12(12):2411. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122411. (PMID: 10.3390/en12122411) ; Hubacek K, Chen X, Feng K, Wiedmann T, Shan Y (2021) Evidence of decoupling consumption-based CO 2 emissions from economic growth. Adv Appl Energy 4:100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100074. (PMID: 10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100074) ; Husnain MIU, Haider A, Khan MA (2021) Does the environmental Kuznets curve reliably explain a developmental issue? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:11469–11485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11402-x. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-020-11402-x) ; Jiang L, He S, Zhong Z, Zhou H, He L (2019) Revisiting environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide emissions: the role of trade. Struct Change and Econ Dyn 50:245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.07.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.07.004) ; Jiborn M, Kander A, Kulionis V, Nielsen H, Moran DD (2018) Decoupling or delusion? Measuring emissions displacement in foreign trade. Glob Environ Change 49:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.006) ; Kaika D, Zervas E (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory. Part b: Critical Issues Energy Policy 62:1403–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.130. (PMID: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.130) ; Karakaya E, Yılmaz B, Alataş S (2019) How production-based and consumption-based emissions accounting systems change climate policy analysis: the case of CO 2 convergence. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:16682–16694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05007-2. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-019-05007-2) ; Lazăr D, Minea A, Purcel AA (2019) Pollution and economic growth: evidence from central and eastern European countries. Energy Econo 81:1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.011. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.011) ; Leal PH, Marques AC (2022) The evolution of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis assessment: a literature review under a critical analysis perspective. Heliyon 8(11):e11521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11521. (PMID: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11521364066799668524) ; Li ZR, Song Y, Zhou AN, Liu J, Pang JR, Zhang M (2020) Study on the pollution emission efficiency of China’s provincial regions: the perspective of environmental Kuznets curve. J Clean Prod 263:121497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121497. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121497) ; Li R, Li L, Wang Q (2022) The impact of energy efficiency on carbon emissions: evidence from the transportation sector in Chinese 30 provinces. Sust Cities Soc 82:103880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103880. (PMID: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103880) ; Li R, Liu Q, Cai W, Liu Y, Yu Y, Zhang Y (2023a) Echelon peaking path of China’s provincial building carbon emissions: considering peak and time constraints. Energy 271:127003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127003) ; Li R, Wang Q, Li L, Hu S (2023b) Do natural resource rent and corruption governance reshape the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint? Evidence from 158 countries. Resour Policy 85:103890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103890. (PMID: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103890) ; Lininger C (2015) Consumption as a base for emission accounting and as a policy base. Consumption-based approaches in international climate policy. Springer, pp 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15991-1_2. (PMID: 10.1007/978-3-319-15991-1_2) ; Liu Q, Wang Q (2017) Sources and flows of China’s virtual SO 2 emission transfers embodied in interprovincial trade: a multiregional input–output analysis. J Clean Prod 161:735–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.003) ; Lu CX, Venevsky S, Shi XL, Wang LY, Wright JS, Wu C (2021) Econometrics of the environmental Kuznets curve: testing advancement to carbon intensity-oriented sustainability for eight economic zones in China. J Clean Prod 283:124561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124561. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124561) ; Mahalik MK, Mallick H, Padhan H (2021) Do educational levels influence the environmental quality? The role of renewable and non-renewable energy demand in selected BRICS countries with a new policy perspective. Renew Energy 164:419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.090. (PMID: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.090) ; Meng J, Liu J, Xu Y, Guan D, Liu Z, Huang Y, Tao S (2016) Globalization and pollution: tele-connecting local primary PM2. 5 emissions to global consumption. Proc R Soc London Ser A-Math Phys Eng Sci 472(2195):20160380. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0380. (PMID: 10.1098/rspa.2016.0380) ; Mi Z, Meng J, Zheng H, Shan Y, Wei YM, Guan D (2018) A multi-regional input-output table mapping China’s economic outputs and interdependencies in 2012. Sci Data 5(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.155. (PMID: 10.1038/sdata.2018.155) ; Moreau V, Vuille F (2018) Decoupling energy use and economic growth: counter evidence from structural effects and embodied energy in trade. Appl Energy 215:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.044. (PMID: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.044) ; Murthy KVB, Gambhir S (2018) Analyzing environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypothesis in India in the context of domestic and global policy change. Australas Account Bus Financ J 12(2):134–156. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v12i2.9. (PMID: 10.14453/aabfj.v12i2.9) ; Newig J, Challies E, Cotta B, Lenschow A, Schilling-Vacaflor A (2020) Governing global telecoupling toward environmental sustainability. Ecol Soc 25(4):21. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11844-250421. (PMID: 10.5751/ES-11844-250421) ; Ning Y, Miao L, Ding T, Zhang B (2019) Carbon emission spillover and feedback effects in China based on a multiregional input-output model. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.022. (PMID: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.022) ; Özcan B, Öztürk I (2019) Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC): a manual. Academic Press. ; Özokcu S, Özdemir Ö (2017) Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.059. (PMID: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.059) ; Pan C, Peters GP, Andrew RM, Korsbakken JI, Li S, Zhou P, Zhou D (2018) Structural changes in provincial emission transfers within China. Environ Sci Technol 52(22):12958–12967. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03424. (PMID: 10.1021/acs.est.8b0342430339021) ; Pandey S, Dogan E, Taskin D (2020) Production-based and consumption-based approaches for the energy-growth-environment nexus: evidence from Asian countries. Sustain Prod Consump 23:274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.006) ; Pascual U, Palomo I, Adams WM, Chan KM, Daw TM, Garmendia E, Phelps J (2017) Off-stage ecosystem service burdens: a blind spot for global sustainability. Environ Res Lett 12(7):075001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7392. (PMID: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7392) ; Prell C, Sun L, Feng K, He J, Hubacek K (2017) Uncovering the spatially distant feedback loops of global trade: a network and input-output approach. Sci Total Environ 586:401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.202. (PMID: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.20228233613) ; Purcel AA (2020) New insights into the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in developing and transition economies: a literature survey. Environ Econ Policy Stud 22:585–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00272-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s10018-020-00272-9) ; Rocco MV, Ferrer RJF, Colombo E (2018) Understanding the energy metabolism of world economies through the joint use of production- and consumption-based energy accountings. Appl Energy 211:590–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.090. (PMID: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.090) ; Rose A, Casler S (1996) Input-output structural decomposition analysis: a critical appraisal. Econ Syst Res 8(1):33–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319600000003. (PMID: 10.1080/09535319600000003) ; Salari M, Javid RJ, Noghanibehambari H (2021) The nexus between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the U.S. Econ Anal Policy 69:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.007. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.007) ; Schröder E, Storm S (2020) Economic growth and carbon emissions: the road to “hothouse earth” is paved with good intentions. Int J Polit Econ 49(2):153–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2020.1778866. (PMID: 10.1080/08911916.2020.1778866) ; Sun Z, Tukker A, Behrens P (2018) Going global to local: connecting top-down accounting and local impacts, a methodological review of spatially explicit input–output approaches. Environ Sci Technol 53(3):1048–1062. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03148. (PMID: 10.1021/acs.est.8b031486391040) ; Tilsted JP, Bjørn A, Majeau-Bettez G, Lund JF (2021) Accounting matters: revisiting claims of decoupling and genuine green growth in Nordic countries. Ecol Econ 187:107101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107101. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107101) ; Torpman O (2022) Consumption-based emissions accounting and historical emissions. Ethics Policy Env 25(3):354–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2022.2058296. (PMID: 10.1080/21550085.2022.2058296) ; Tukker A, Bulavskaya T, Giljum S, de Koning A, Lutter S, Simas M, Stadler K, Wood R (2014) The global resource footprint of nations. Carbon, water, land and materials embodied in trade and final consumption calculated with EXIOBASE 2.1. ; Wang Y, Geschke A, Lenzen M (2017) Constructing a time series of nested multiregion input–output tables. Int Reg Sci Rev 40(5):476–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017615603596. (PMID: 10.1177/0160017615603596) ; Wang Y, Bi F, Zhang Z, Zuo J, Zillante G, Du H, Li J (2018a) Spatial production fragmentation and PM2. 5 related emissions transfer through three different trade patterns within China. J Clean Prod 195:703–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.195. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.195) ; Wang Z, Li Y, Cai H, Wang B (2018b) Comparative analysis of regional carbon emissions accounting methods in China: production-based versus consumption-based principles. J Clean Prod 194:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.018. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.018) ; Wang S, Wang J, Li S, Fang C, Feng K (2019) Socioeconomic driving forces and scenario simulation of CO 2 emissions for a fast-developing region in China. J Clean Prod 216:217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.143. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.143) ; Wang Q, Jiang F, Li R, Wang X (2022) Does protectionism improve environment of developing countries? A perspective of environmental efficiency assessment. Sustain Prod Consump 30:851–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.011. (PMID: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.011) ; Wang Q, Ge Y, Li R (2023a) Does improving economic efficiency reduce ecological footprint? The role of financial development, renewable energy, and industrialization. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231183914. (PMID: 10.1177/0958305X231183914) ; Wang Q, Zhang F, Li R (2023b) Free trade and carbon emissions revisited: the asymmetric impacts of trade diversification and trade openness. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2703. (PMID: 10.1002/sd.2703) ; Wang Q, Zhang F, Li R (2023c) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in 208 counties: the roles of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent. Environ Res 216:114637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114637. (PMID: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.11463736283438) ; Wang Q, Hu S, Li R (2023d) Could information and communication technology (ICT) reduce carbon emissions? The role of trade openness and financial development. Telecomm Policy 102699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102699. ; Wang Q, Ren F, Li R (2023e) Exploring the impact of geopolitics on the environmental Kuznets curve research. Sustain Dev 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2743. ; Wu LK, Feng TT, Luo H, Gong XL, Ge JP (2022) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: considering the impact of Sino-US trade on three main industries in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(36):54796–54812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19522-2. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-022-19522-2) ; Xia D, Zhang L, Zhou D, Pian Q (2023) Continuous allocation of carbon emission quota considering different paths to carbon peak: based on multi-objective optimization. Energy Policy 178:113622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113622. (PMID: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113622) ; Xu H, Zhao G, Xie R, Zhu K (2020) A trade-related CO 2 emissions and its composition: evidence from China. J Environ Manage 270:110893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110893. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11089332721330) ; Xu W, Xie Y, Xia D, Ji L, Huang G (2021) A multi-sectoral decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions in Guangdong province. China J Environ Manage 298:113485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113485. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11348534385114) ; Yang L, Yang Y, Lv H, Wang D (2020a) Whether China made efforts to decouple economic growth from CO 2 emissions?-Production vs consumption perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:5138–5154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07317-x. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-019-07317-x) ; Yang Y, Qu S, Cai B, Liang S, Wang Z, Wang J, Xu M (2020b) Mapping global carbon footprint in China. Nat Commun 11(1):2237. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15883-9. (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-020-15883-9323820187206023) ; Zhang K, Wang X (2021) Pollution haven hypothesis of global CO 2 , SO 2 , NOx—evidence from 43 economies and 56 sectors. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(12):6552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126552. (PMID: 10.3390/ijerph18126552342070278296498) ; Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Zhu K (2020) Allocating carbon responsibility: the role of spatial production fragmentation. Energy Econ 87:104491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104491. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104491) ; Zhou D, Zhou X, Xu Q, Wu F, Wang Q, Zha D (2018) Regional embodied carbon emissions and their transfer characteristics in China. Struct Change and Econ Dyn 46:180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.05.008. (PMID: 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.05.008)
- Grant Information: 17BJY054 National Social Science Fund of China; 71971048 National Natural Science Foundation of China; 71973056 National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Carbon emission transfer; Environmental Kuznets curve; Interregional connection; Multi-regional input–output model; Pollution haven effect
- Substance Nomenclature: 142M471B3J (Carbon Dioxide)
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20240223 Date Completed: 20240319 Latest Revision: 20240319
- Update Code: 20240319
|
