Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article; Review
- Language: English
- [Nat Comput Sci] 2024 Feb; Vol. 4 (2), pp. 96-103. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2024 Feb 26.
- MeSH Terms: Drug Industry* ; Algorithms* ; Drug Development
- References: Brown, N. et al. Artificial intelligence in chemistry and drug design. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 34, 709–715 (2020). (PMID: 10.1007/s10822-020-00317-x32468207) ; Kopp, E. BioXCel Therapeutics announces FDA approval of IGALMI™ (dexmedetomidine) sublingual film for acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder in adults. BioXcel Therapeutics (6 April 2022). ; Savage, N. Drug discovery companies are customizing ChatGPT: here’s how. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 585–586 (2023). (PMID: 10.1038/s41587-023-01788-737095351) ; Joachim, B., Rehm, W., Ryan, S. & Wright, P. A biotech survival kit for a challenging public-market environment. McKinsey (19 September 2022). ; Leclerc, O., Suhendra, M. & The, L. What are the biotech investment themes that will shape the industry? McKinsey (10 June 2022). ; Hodgson, J. 2022—toughing out the trough. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 159–173 (2023). (PMID: 10.1038/s41587-023-01661-7) ; Prieto-Martínez, F. D., López-López, E., Juárez-Mercado, K. E. & Medina-Franco, J. L. in In Silico Drug Design (ed. Roy, K.) 19–44 (Academic, 2019). ; Mayr, A. et al. Large-scale comparison of machine learning methods for drug target prediction on ChEMBL. Chem. Sci. 9, 5441–5451 (2018). (PMID: 10.1039/C8SC00148K301552346011237) ; Zhu, H. Big data and artificial intelligence modeling for drug discovery. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 60, 573–589 (2020). (PMID: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010919-02332431518513) ; Borhani, D. W. & Shaw, D. E. The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 26, 15–26 (2012). ; Modulus discovery closes $20.4M USD Series C. Modulus (1 March 2022). ; Jarvis, L. M. Relay Therapeutics launches to tackle protein movement. Chemical & Engineering News (14 September 2016). ; Bell, J. Gilead taps into machine learning to find new NASH drugs. BioPharma Dive (16 April 2019). ; Chory, E. J., Gretton, D. W., DeBenedictis, E. A. & Esvelt, K. M. Enabling high-throughput biology with flexible open-source automation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e9942 (2021). (PMID: 10.15252/msb.20209942337646807993322) ; Ma, C., Peng, Y., Li, H. & Chen, W. Organ-on-a-chip: a new paradigm for drug development. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 42, 119–133 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.11.00933341248) ; Reker, D. Practical considerations for active machine learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 32/33, 73–79 (2019). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.06.00133386097) ; Wadman, M. FDA no longer needs to require animal tests before human drug trials. Science 379, 127–128 (2023). (PMID: 10.1126/science.adg627636634170) ; Hemmerich, J. & Ecker, G. F. In silico toxicology: from structure–activity relationships towards deep learning and adverse outcome pathways. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 10, e1475 (2020). (PMID: 10.1002/wcms.1475358661389286356) ; Baig, M. H. et al. Computer aided drug design: successes and limitations. Curr. Pharm. Des. 22, 572–581 (2016). (PMID: 10.2174/138161282266615112500055026601966) ; Bhardwaj, A. et al. Open source drug discovery—a new paradigm of collaborative research in tuberculosis drug development. Tuberculosis 91, 479–486 (2011). (PMID: 21782516) ; Weingarten, M. D. E. Shaw Research licenses first-in-class therapeutic for immunological diseases to Lilly. D. E. Shaw Research (13 June 2022). ; Hale, C. Schrödinger’s in-house pipeline helps fetch $2.7B molecule discovery deal with BMS. Fierce Biotech (18 January 2020). ; Olleros, F.-J. Emerging industries and the burnout of pioneers. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 3, 5–18 (1986). (PMID: 10.1111/1540-5885.310005) ; Pagano, M., Panetta, F. & Zingales, L. Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. J. Financ. 53, 27–64 (2002). (PMID: 10.1111/0022-1082.25448) ; Eboli, M., Ozel, B., Teglio, A. & Toto, A. Connectivity, centralisation and ‘robustness-yet-fragility’ of interbank networks. Ann. Finance 19, 169–200 (2022). ; Alexander, C. M. et al. Trends and perspectives of biological drug approvals by the FDA: a review from 2015 to 2021. Biomedicines 10, 2325 (2022). (PMID: 10.3390/biomedicines10092325) ; Madura Jayatunga, L. B., Ludwig, R., Schulze, U. & Meier, C. in In Vivo (Pharma Intelligence, 2022). ; Lajoie, J. M. & Shusta, E. V. Targeting receptor-mediated transport for delivery of biologics across the blood–brain barrier. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 55, 613–631 (2015). (PMID: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-12485225340933) ; Bender, A. & Cortés-Ciriano, I. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: what is realistic, what are illusions? Part 1: Ways to make an impact, and why we are not there yet. Drug Discov. Today 26, 511–524 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.12.00933346134) ; Eisenstein, M. Active machine learning helps drug hunters tackle biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 512–514 (2020). (PMID: 10.1038/s41587-020-0521-432393920) ; AlphaFold and beyond. Nat. Methods 20, 163 (2023). ; Markey, C. & Croset, S. ComputationalDrugRD. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10482006 (2024).
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20240227 Date Completed: 20240229 Latest Revision: 20240607
- Update Code: 20240607
|