Einzeltreffer — DigiBib

Purpose: Deformable image registration (DIR) is a key enabling technology in many diagnostic and therapeutic tasks, but often does not meet the required robustness and accuracy for supporting clinical tasks. This is in large part due to a lack of high-quality benchmark datasets by which new DIR algorithms can be evaluated. Our team was supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering to develop DIR benchmark dataset libraries for multiple anatomical sites, comprising of large numbers of highly accurate landmark pairs on matching blood vessel bifurcations. Here we introduce our lung CT DIR benchmark dataset library, which was developed to improve upon the number and distribution of landmark pairs in current public lung CT benchmark datasets.

Acquisition and Validation Methods: Thirty CT image pairs were acquired from several publicly available repositories as well as authors' institution with IRB approval. The data processing workflow included multiple steps: (1) The images were denoised. (2) Lungs, airways, and blood vessels were automatically segmented. (3) Bifurcations were directly detected on the skeleton of the segmented vessel tree. (4) Falsely identified bifurcations were filtered out using manually defined rules. (5) A DIR was used to project landmarks detected on the first image onto the second image of the image pair to form landmark pairs. (6) Landmark pairs were manually verified. This workflow resulted in an average of 1262 landmark pairs per image pair. Estimates of the landmark pair target registration error (TRE) using digital phantoms were 0.4 mm ± 0.3 mm.

Data Format and Usage Notes: The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8200423. Instructions for use can be found at https://github.com/deshanyang/Lung-DIR-QA.

Potential Applications: The dataset library generated in this work is the largest of its kind to date and will provide researchers with a new and improved set of ground truth benchmarks for quantitatively validating DIR algorithms within the lung.

Titel:	A comprehensive lung CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	Criscuolo, ER ; Fu, Y ; Hao, Y ; Zhang, Z ; Yang, D
Link:	Full Text Finder (Volltext)
Zeitschrift:	Medical physics, Jg. 51 (2024-05-01), Heft 5, S. 3806-3817
Veröffentlichung:	2017- : Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley and Sons, Inc. ; <i>Original Publication</i>: Lancaster, Pa., Published for the American Assn. of Physicists in Medicine by the American Institute of Physics., 2024
Medientyp:	academicJournal
ISSN:	2473-4209 (electronic)
DOI:	10.1002/mp.17026
Schlagwort:	Humans Lung diagnostic imaging Algorithms Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE Sprachen: English Publication Type: Journal Article Language: English [Med Phys] 2024 May; Vol. 51 (5), pp. 3806-3817. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2024 Mar 13. MeSH Terms: Lung* / diagnostic imaging ; Algorithms* ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted* / methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed* / methods ; Humans References: Jingu K, Kadoya N. Use of Deformable Image Registration for Radiotherapy Applications. J Radiol Radiat Ther. 2014;2(2):1042. doi:10.47739/2333‐7095/1042. ; Zhang T, Chi Y, Meldolesi E, Yan D. Automatic delineation of on‐line head‐and‐neck computed tomography images: toward on‐line adaptive radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(2):522‐530. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.038. ; Chao M, Xie Y, Xing L. Auto‐propagation of contours for adaptive prostate radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(17):4533‐4542. doi:10.1088/0031‐9155/53/17/005. ; Hof H, Rhein B, Haering P, Kopp‐Schneider A, Debus J, Herfarth K. 4D‐CT‐based target volume definition in stereotactic radiotherapy of lung tumours: comparison with a conventional technique using individual margins. Radiother Oncol. 2009;93(3):419‐423. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.040. ; Boldea V, Sharp GC, Jiang SB, Sarrut D. 4D‐CT lung motion estimation with deformable registration: quantification of motion nonlinearity and hysteresis. Med Phys. 2008;35(3):1008‐1018. doi:10.1118/1.2839103. ; Lee C, Langen KM, Lu W, et al. Assessment of parotid gland dose changes during head and neck cancer radiotherapy using daily megavoltage computed tomography and deformable image registration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71(5):1563‐1571. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.013. ; Cleary K, Peters TM. Image‐guided interventions: technology review and clinical applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;12:119‐142. doi:10.1146/annurev‐bioeng‐070909‐105249. ; Brock KK, Mutic S, McNutt TR, Li H, Kessler ML. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132. Med Phys. 2017;44(7):e43‐e76. doi:10.1002/mp.12256. ; Brock KK. Results of a multi‐institution deformable registration accuracy study (MIDRAS). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(2):583‐596. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.031. ; Rohlfing T. Image similarity and tissue overlaps as surrogates for image registration accuracy: widely used but unreliable. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31(2):153‐163. doi:10.1109/tmi.2011.2163944. ; Li S, Glide‐Hurst C, Lu M, et al. Voxel‐based statistical analysis of uncertainties associated with deformable image registration. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(18):6481‐6494. doi:10.1088/0031‐9155/58/18/6481. ; Latifi K, Zhang G, Stawicki M, van Elmpt W, Dekker A, Forster K. Validation of three deformable image registration algorithms for the thorax. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14(1):3834. doi:10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.3834. ; Kadoya N, Fujita Y, Katsuta Y, et al. Evaluation of various deformable image registration algorithms for thoracic images. J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 2013;55(1):175‐182. doi:10.1093/jrr/rrt093. ; Vandemeulebroucke J, Sarrut D, Clarysse P. The POPI‐Model, a point validated pixel‐based breathing thorax model. Proceeding of the XVth ICCR Conference, Toronto, Canada. 2007. ; Vishnevskiy V, Gass T, Szekely G, Tanner C, Goksel O. Isotropic total variation regularization of displacements in parametric image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017;36(2):385‐395. doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2610583. ; Vandemeulebroucke J, Rit S, Kybic J, Clarysse P, Sarrut D. Spatiotemporal motion estimation for respiratory‐correlated imaging of the lungs. Med Phys. 2011;38(1):166‐178. doi:10.1118/1.3523619. ; Castillo R, Castillo E, Guerra R, et al. A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(7):1849. doi:10.1088/0031‐9155/54/7/001. ; Castillo R, Castillo E, Fuentes D, et al. A reference dataset for deformable image registration spatial accuracy evaluation using the COPDgene study archive. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(9):2861‐2877. doi:10.1088/0031‐9155/58/9/2861. ; Fu Y, Wu X, Thomas AM, Li HH, Yang D. Automatic large quantity landmark pairs detection in 4DCT lung images. Med Phys. 2019;46(10):4490‐4501. doi:10.1002/mp.13726. ; Varadhan R, Magome T, Hui S. Characterization of deformation and physical force in uniform low contrast anatomy and its impact on accuracy of deformable image registration. Med Phys. 2016;43(1):52. doi:10.1118/1.4937935. ; Yang D, Zhang M, Chang X, et al. A method to detect landmark pairs accurately between intra‐patient volumetric medical images. Med Phys. 2017;44(11):5859‐5872. doi:10.1002/mp.12526. ; Werner R, Duscha C, Schmidt‐Richberg A, Ehrhardt J, Handels H. Assessing Accuracy of Non‐linear Registration in 4D Image Data using Automatically Detected Landmark Correspondences. SPIE Proceedings. 2013;8669:264‐272. doi:10.1117/12.2002454. ; Cazoulat G, Anderson BM, McCulloch MM, Rigaud B, Koay EJ, Brock KK. Detection of vessel bifurcations in CT scans for automatic objective assessment of deformable image registration accuracy. Med Phys. 2021;48(10):5935‐5946. doi:10.1002/mp.15163. ; Murphy K, van Ginneken B, Reinhardt JM, et al. Evaluation of registration methods on thoracic CT: the EMPIRE10 challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011;30(11):1901‐1920. doi:10.1109/tmi.2011.2158349. ; Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, et al. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(6):1045‐1057. doi:10.1007/s10278‐013‐9622‐7. ; Albertina B, Watson M, Holback C, et al. Data from: the Cancer Genome Atlas Lung Adenocarcinoma Collection (TCGA‐LUAD). The Cancer Imaging Archive. 2016;4. doi:10.7937/K9/TCIA.2016.JGNIHEP5. ; Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers. Nature. 2012;489(7417):519‐525. doi:10.1038/nature11404. ; Zhang K, Zuo W, Zhang L. FFDNet: toward a fast and flexible solution for CNN‐based image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018;27:4608‐4622. doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2839891 2018. ; Doel T, Matin TN, Gleeson FV, Gavaghan DJ, Grau V. Pulmonary lobe segmentation from CT images using fissureness, airways, vessels and multilevel B‐splines. 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) ,Barcelona, Spain. 2012:1491‐1494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235854. ; Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Vincken KL, Viergever MA. Multiscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering. Springer; 1998:130‐137. ; Vercauteren T, Pennec X, Perchant A, Ayache N. Diffeomorphic demons: efficient non‐parametric image registration. Neuroimage. 2009;45(Suppl 1):S61‐S72. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.040. ; Townsley MI. Structure and composition of pulmonary arteries, capillaries, and veins. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(1):675‐709. doi:10.1002/cphy.c100081. ; Kassab GS, Lin DH, Fung Y. Morphometry of pig coronary venous system. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1994;267(6):H2100‐H2113. ; Huang W, Yen RT, McLaurine M, Bledsoe G. Morphometry of the human pulmonary vasculature. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996;81(5):2123‐2133. doi:10.1152/jappl.1996.81.5.2123. Grant Information: R01-EB029431 National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) Contributed Indexing: Keywords: deformable image registration; ground truth dataset; lung motion Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20240313 Date Completed: 20240507 Latest Revision: 20240507 Update Code: 20240507

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

A comprehensive lung CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms.