INSTITUCIONALNI MODEL VISOKOG OBRAZOVANJA KAO OKVIR ZA UPRAVLJANJE ZNANJEM. (Bosnian)
In: Knowledge: International Journal, Jg. 31 (2019-06-20), Heft 5, S. 1217-1222
academicJournal
Zugriff:
Process management in any organization is primarily limited by characteristics of the organization. This equally applies to higher education area. The management system for higher education institutions is based on its institutional characteristics. The essential elements on which the quality of knowledge management in higher education institutions depends are: the status of higher education institutions, the quality of institutions of higher education and the system of financing higher education institutions. In the case of Montenegro, as transition country, important elements of the system of higher education are defined by Low from 2018. The status of the institutions does not comply with international standards. We do not have the possibility for a clear international recognition of higher education institutions in Montenegro (University, College, College-University ), as well as clearly defined universities of academic and applied sciences university (Croatian University). The functionality and equity of higher education institutions must be ensured by regulations and change the disability status of independent faculties in the current legislation. Problematic points of the existing Law are related to the following: financial guarantee of continuity of study programs and re-accreditation of study programs. It is necessary to legislate new principles of higher education financing which support the balance between the financing of higher education institutions (on the basis of a contract on education of a certain staff profile) and direct student financing (through vouchers for the benefit of students, at the expense of the budget and / or granting loans to students education, which, depending on the achieved success, which students return to certain deadlines after graduation and employment). Tuition fees for all institutions of higher education must be based on an objectively determined cost of student studies, and tuition fees below the cost price (prohibition of dumping fees) should not be tolerated, except for the usual incentives, discounts and scholarships at the expense of the institution's funds, but not the funds that the institution receives from the budget. Accreditation and re-accreditation of the higher education institution should provide conditions for: internal quality assurance, external quality assurance and control of the process by quality assurance agencies. Under the conditions of this higher education system, uninterrupted development of modern forms of higher education is possible, especially one that is dominant in developed education systems, as well as the success of knowledge management in the higher education system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Upravljanje procesima u bilo kojoj organizaciji primarno je limitirno karakteristikama same ogranizacije. To jednako važi i za oblast visokog obrazovanja. Sistem upravljanja ustanovama visokog obrazovanja izrasta na samim njegovim institucionalmim karakteristikama. Bitni elementi od kojih zavisi kvalitet upravljanja znanjem u institucijama visokog obrazovanja su: status ustanova visokog obrazovanja, kvalitet ustanova visokog obrazovanja i sistem finansiranja ustanova visokog obrazovanja. U slučaju Crne Gore, kao zemlje u tranziciji, bitni elementi sistema visokog školstva su definisani Zakonom iz 2018. godine. Status ustanova ne odgovara međunarodnim standardima. U našem nemamo mogućnost za jasno internacionalno prepoznavanje ustanova visokog obrazovanja u Crnoj Gori (University, College, College - University = Univerzitet, Koledž, Koledž - Univerzitet), kao ni jasno definisane univerzitete akademskih i univerzitete primjenjenih nauka (u Hrvatskoj Sveučiliste i Veleučilište). Funkcionalnost i ravnopravnost ustanova visokog obrazovanja moraju se propisima obezbijediti i promijeniti invalidni status samostalnih fakulteta u sadašnjem zakonodavstvu. Problematične tačke postojećeg Zakona se, prevashodno, odnose na slijedeće: finansijsko garantovanje kontinuiteta studijskih programa i reakreditacija studijskih programa. Potrebno je zakonodavno uobličiti nove principe finansiranja visokog obrazovanja koje podržavaju balans između finansiranja ustanova visokog obrazovanja (na bazi ugovora o školovanju određenog profila kadrova) i direktnog finansiranja studenata (putem vaučera u korist studenata, a na teret budžeta, i/ili dodjelom kredita studentima za školovanje, koje oni, zavisno od postignutog uspjeha, vraćaju u odredenim rokovima nakon diplomiranja i zapošljenja). Školarine na svim ustanovama visokog obrazovanja se moraju zasnivati na objektivno utvrđenoj cijeni koštanja po studentu i ne treba tolerisati određivanje školarina ispod cijene koštanja (zabrana damping školarina), osim uobičajenih stimulansa, popusta i stipendija na teret sredstava ustanove, ali ne i sredstava koja ustanova dobija iz budžeta. Akreditacijom i reakreditacijom ustanova visokog obrazovanja treba osigurati uslove za: unutrašnje obezbjeđivanje kvaliteta, spoljašnje obezbjeđivanje kvaliteta i kontrolu procresa od strane agencije za obezbjeđivanje kvaliteta. U uslovima ovako postavljenog sistema visokog obrazovanja moguć je nesmetan razvoj savremenih oblika visokog obrazovanja, naročito onog koji je dominantan u razvijenim obrazovnim sistemima, kao i uspješan menadžment znanja u sistemu visokog školstva. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Knowledge: International Journal is the property of Institute for Knowledge Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Titel: |
INSTITUCIONALNI MODEL VISOKOG OBRAZOVANJA KAO OKVIR ZA UPRAVLJANJE ZNANJEM. (Bosnian)
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Ratković, Rade ; Žečević, Dragana ; Vulević, Milica |
Zeitschrift: | Knowledge: International Journal, Jg. 31 (2019-06-20), Heft 5, S. 1217-1222 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2019 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 2545-4439 (print) |
DOI: | 10.35120/kij31051217r |
Sonstiges: |
|