ہعل ی ت دنبر و ں ےک اسگنسر ی ےس ہقلعتم ر و. (Urdu)
In: Journal of Religious Studies (UOCHJRS), Jg. 3 (2020), Heft 2, S. 93-101
academicJournal
Zugriff:
It is well known that Sahih Bukhari is the most authentic and reliable book after Holy Quran. Even there is an unavoidable increase in the number of Islamic scholars who are arguing that every hadith in Sahih Bukhari is right and true and also there is Ijma/ consensus about it. Although there were some Islamic scholars who disapprove of this argument and criticize it in terms of text and sanad. Some hadith of Bukhari were rejected based on contradiction to following, Quranic verses, famous Sunnah, Ijma, wise reality, Historical facts and Sharia rules. One of these narrations is the narration of Amr Ibn Maimoon regarding the stoning of monkeys, which he rejected as irrational and against the Sharia. In this article, we will critically describe the objections raised against the narration and the answers given by the scholars. This discussion is based in the light of sayings and views of Islamic religious scholars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Religious Studies (UOCHJRS) is the property of Journal of Religious Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Titel: |
ہعل ی ت دنبر و ں ےک اسگنسر ی ےس ہقلعتم ر و. (Urdu)
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Iqbal, Naveed ; Rehman, Zia ur |
Zeitschrift: | Journal of Religious Studies (UOCHJRS), Jg. 3 (2020), Heft 2, S. 93-101 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2020 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 2616-6496 (print) |
DOI: | 10.33195/uochjrs-v3i22042020 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|