KAKO JE “PRANJE RUKU” ISPRALO KOLEKTIVNO I INDIVIDUALNO PAMĆENJE – PILATOVSKI MOTIV U STVARALAŠTVU IVANA ARALICE. (Croatian)
In: Croatica et Slavica Iadertina, Jg. 16 (2020), Heft 1, S. 179-207
academicJournal
Zugriff:
The philological analysis of several literary works of Ivan Aralica (novellas and novels) focuses on using motifs related to Pontius Pilate. These motifs are observed within the oral literary tradition as a substrate widely represented in the overall literary endeavour of Ivan Aralica. While Pontius Pilate does not significantly deviate from his usual Biblical image in oral literary forms (re-establishing thus the collective “author” as the intertextual narrator insusceptible to significant conceptual interventions with respect to the original text), Aralica uses different intertextual techniques to build his own attitude towards the motif of Pontius Pilate. Contrary to the common portrayal of Pontius Pilate as a literary figure in fiction, Aralica used his Biblical position which is dominant in the oral literary tradition and upgraded it with a vast spectrum of meanings. By using a network of attributed meanings, he tried to tackle the issue of the interrelation of personal and collective responsibility. He leans on the concept of history defined by his historical novels (although the analysis included works beyond his novels), namely history as a(n) (un)prolific source of memory. He, advocates, sometimes vaguely, personal responsibility as the (potentially) right way for collective responsibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
U nekoliko Araličinih književnih djela (pripovijetki i romana) razmatra se uporaba pilatovskoga motiva. Taj se motiv promatra i unutar usmenoknjiževne tradicije kao supstrata koji je u velikoj mjeri zastupljen u ukupnome Araličinu stvaralaštvu. Dok se u usmenoknjiževnim oblicima Poncije Pilat uvelike ne udaljava od biblijske slike, potvrđujući tako kolektiv kao intertekstualni prijenosnik nepodložan znatnim idejnim intervencijama u odnosu na izvorni tekst, različitim intertekstualnim tehnikama Aralica izgrađuje vlastiti odnos prema pilatovskome motivu. Uz najčešći pristup u umjetničkoj književnosti koji Poncija Pilata oblikuje kao zaseban književni lik, individualizirajući ga i često mijenjajući njegovu biblijsku poziciju, Aralica se koristi drugačijim postupkom tvorbe lika, što posljedično utječe i na njegovu intertekstualnu funkciju. Temeljnu biblijsku poziciju prototipskoga karaktera Aralica nadograđuje nizom značenja. Mrežom postavljenih značenja traži odgovor na pitanje odnosa osobne i kolektivne odgovornosti. Naslonjen djelomično na koncepciju povijesti definiranu vlastitim povijesnim romanima (iako sva analizirana djela nisu pisana u tome ključu), prije svega na povijest kao (ne)plodno pamćenje, opredjeljuje se, iako ne uvijek jasno, za osobnu odgovornost kao (mogući) ispravan put za oblikovanje kolektivne odgovornosti. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Croatica et Slavica Iadertina is the property of University of Zadar, Department of Croatian & Slavic Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Titel: |
KAKO JE “PRANJE RUKU” ISPRALO KOLEKTIVNO I INDIVIDUALNO PAMĆENJE – PILATOVSKI MOTIV U STVARALAŠTVU IVANA ARALICE. (Croatian)
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | ODŽA, IVANA |
Zeitschrift: | Croatica et Slavica Iadertina, Jg. 16 (2020), Heft 1, S. 179-207 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2020 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 1845-6839 (print) |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|