Fas, Caspase‐8, and Caspase‐9 pathway‐mediated bile acid‐induced fetal cardiomyocyte apoptosis in intrahepatic cholestasis pregnant rat models.

Aim: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a specific complication in the middle and late pregnancy and has been recognized as one of the high‐risk pregnancy for sudden fetal death. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of Fas, Caspase‐8, and Caspase‐9 pathways in the internal relations of fetal myocardial apoptosis in ICP rat models, thus resulting in fetal intrauterine death. Furthermore, we researched whether ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) promoted benefits in fetal cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Materials and methods: To establish ICP rat models, on the 15th day of pregnancy, rats were injected 17α‐ethynyl estradiol (EE2). Meanwhile, in experimental group, pregnant rats were treated with EE2 + UDCA. All rats were sacrificed on the 21st day of pregnancy. The expression levels of Fas, Caspase‐8, and Caspase‐9 were examined by western blot and real‐time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Fetal rat cardiac tissues were removed and stained for pathological evaluation. In addition, we observed fetal myocardial structure by using transmission electron microscopy. Results: We detected high concentrations of bile acids and transaminase in the fetal circulation. And we found increased expression levels of Fas, Caspase‐8, and Caspase‐9 proteins and mRNA in the fetal cardiomyocyte in EE2‐treated group but not in control‐ or EE2 + UDCA‐treated groups. Furthermore, compared to controls, EE2‐treated rats exhibited severe fetal myocardial structure damage and the apoptotic bodies by using transmission electron microscopy. UDCA reversed the impairment of fetal cardiomyocytes. Conclusion: Our study has led to research into the association between activation of Fas, Caspase‐8, and Caspase‐9 pathways and bile acid‐induced fetal cardiomyocyte apoptosis, which may be one of the mechanisms on fetal cardiac death in ICP. More importantly, UDCA may improve the adverse outcome of fetus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)