QUELQUES REMARQUES SUR LE SENS OPPOSĖ DES MOTS ORIGINAIRES CHEZ FREUD, BENVENISTE ET LACAN. (Romanian)

The article analyses the clash between linguistics and psychoanalysis with regard to the supposed antithetical meaning of primary words. Taking the encounter between Lacan and Benveniste as a starting point, it discusses the majority of arguments that have been brought forward in this longstanding debate, often led by confusion with re gard to its object. After insisting upon the necessary distinction between language and speech, passing through two important excursions, on the one hand into the question of being and signification and on the other hand into the wonderful world of Heraclitean opposites, the article finishes with an extended and chronological analysis of all major references which exist in Freud's works about this subject. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Yearbook of George Baritiu Institute of History in Cluj-Napoca, Series Humanistica is the property of Romanian Academy, Institute of History 'George Baritiu', Cluj-Napoca and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)