ISUS I MUDROST U SINOPTIČKIM EVANĐELJIMA S OSOBITIM OSVRTOM NA EVANĐEOSKA POZIVANJA NA STAROZAVJETNU MUDROST. (Croatian)

The article is primarily dealing with the usage of the noun aocpla in the synoptic gospels and shows that the noun appears once in Mark's Gospel, three times in Matthew's Gospel, and six times in Luke's Gospel. Of course, the very appearance of the noun aocpla does not by itself point to the influence of Old Testament sapiential literature, but the aforementioned statistical indications remain as an introduction to deeper study of sapiential places in individual gospels. Thus, the first part of the article focuses on those places at which the noun aocpla appears and demonstrate that Mark does not show much interest for the noun and its semantic circle, that Luke speaks about Jesus as a teacher and mediator of wisdom, and that only Matthew realises, already on this level, the identification of Jesus with Wisdom. In the second part of the article, the author studies those texts of synoptic gospels that contain allusions to sapiential literature of the Old Testament or implicit quotations of that literature. Similar conclusions follow: Mark is not interested in the idea of wisdom, Luke emphasises Jesus's mediating role in relation to wisdom here as well, and Matthew identifies Jesus with personified Wisdom. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rad se najprije bavi uporabom imenice crocptcr u sinoptičkim evanđeljima te pokazuje da se u Markovu evanđelju pojavljuje jedanput, u Matejevu triput, a u Lukinu čak šest puta. Naravno da samo pojavljivanje imenice crorpicr ne ukazuje na utjecaj starozavjetne mudrosne književnosti, no ti statistički pokazatelji ostaju uvod za dublje proučavanje mudrosnih mjesta u pojedinim evanđeljima. Stoga je u prvom dijelu ovog rada posebna pozornost posvećena upravo onim mjestima u kojima se pojavljuje imenica crotpict te se vidi da Marko ne pokazuje v@e zanimanje za tu imenicu i njezin semantički krug, da Luka govori o Isusu kao o učitelju i posredniku mudrosti, a samo se kod Mateja već na toj razini uviđa poistovjećivanje Isusa s Mudrošću. U drugom dijelu rada ispitani su tekstovi sinoptičkih evanđelja u kojima se mogu prepoznati aluzije na mudrosnu književnost Starog zavjeta ili implicitni citati te književnosti. Došlo se do sličnih zaključaka: Marko nije zainteresiran za ideju mudrosti, Luka i ovdje stavlja naglasak na Isusovu posredničku ulogu u odnosu na mudrost, a Matej poistovjećuje Isusa s poosobljenom Mudrošću. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Theological Review / Bogoslovska Smotra is the property of University of Zagreb, Catholic Faculty of Theology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)