基于生态系统服务功能的东江流域关键性生态空间识别. (Chinese)

The Dongjiang River Basin has been one of the most important parts of the Pearl River Delta in Guangdong Province, southern China. But the ecological environment of the river basin has been regional fragile in recent years, due to the frequent soil erosion. It is a high demand to identify the critical ecological spaces for environmental security in the sustainable development of the main ecosystem. In this study, an evaluation system was constructed to quantitatively reveal the distribution characteristics of the critical ecological space using importance and sensitivity. Five aspects were selected to identify the regional critical ecological spaces, including the water conservation function, soil and water conservation function, biodiversity function, soil erosion sensitivity, and geological hazard sensitivity. Specifically, an evaluation model was established to fully meet the typical red soil in the ecologically vulnerable areas. The daily rainfall model in the southern mountainous area was selected to obtain the rainfall erosivity factor (R). The soil and water conservation measures factor (P) was determined to acquire various evaluation factors under the similar geographical characteristics. A local evaluation index system was also constructed to accurately identify the critical ecological space using the net primary production quantitative evaluation. A comparative analysis was carried out to verify the accuracy of the identification using Google Earth images and the territorial spatial planning data of the cities and counties in the study area. Finally, the distribution of various critical ecological spaces was explored for the ecological security of land use. The results showed that: 1) The critical ecological space was mainly distributed in the middle and lower reaches, the area of which was 16 734.48 km², accounting for 50.49% of the total area of the basin. Among them, the urgent ecological space was mainly distributed in various nature reserves and scenic spots, the area of which was 5 481.21 km², accounting for 16.54% of the total area of the basin; whereas, the crisis ecological space was mainly distributed in the downstream developed cities, the area of which was 11 253.27 km², accounting for 33.95% of the total area of the basin. The critical ecological space was closer to the area of human activities than the urgent ecological space, and the urgent ecological space was close to the ecological conservation redline space in national land space planning. 2) The conflicts between land use and ecological security showed the most construction and cultivated lands were mainly distributed in the crisis ecological space, including the critical ecological space, accounting for 47.04% and 66.66% of the area, respectively. However, the construction and cultivated land were occupied only 2.48% and 17.35% of the urgent ecological space, accounting for 11.41% and 26.28% of the crisis ecological space, respectively. Each ecological space was characterized by woodland and cultivated land. The feasibility recommendations were also proposed to combine the identification and land use status for the ecological protection strategies in the Dongjiang River Basin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

东江流域生态环境脆弱，水土流失现象频发，进行关键性生态空间识别对维护其生态环境安全和促进区域可持 续发展有着极其重要的意义。该研究通过重要性-敏感性构建关键性生态空间识别评价体系，使用 NPP（Net Primary Productivity）定量评价法、模型评价法，定量揭示其关键性生态空间的分布特征。结果表明：1）东江流域的关键性生态 空间面积为 16 734.48 km²，面积占比 50.49%，主要位于在中游、下游地区。其中，底线型生态空间面积为 5 481.21 km²， 集中分布在自然保护地、风景名胜区之中；危机型生态空间面积为 11 253.27 km²，主要位于下游的经济发达的珠三角城 市中；2）面积占比分别高达 47.04%、66.66%的建设用地、耕地占用关键性生态空间，且都集中分布在危机型生态空间 中，各生态空间地类以林地和耕地为主。最后将识别结果与土地利用状况结合分析，以期为东江流域分区管控的实施、 生态保护策略的制定提供参考。 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering is the property of Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)