进食障碍照料者技能量表 中文版的效度和信度. (Chinese)

Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Skills (CASK) scalein caregivers of anorexia and bulimia nervosa patients. Methods: A total of 151 caregivers of patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa who met the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition ( DSM-5) were selected for CASK evaluation. Among them, 37 caregivers were selected for caregiver skills training, and their CASK scores before and after the training were compared to test the empirical validity. Result: Exploratory factor analysis extracted 6 factors, namely bigger picture, self-care, biting your-tongue, insight and acceptance, emotional intelligence and frustration tolerance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 6-factor model was well fitted (x² / df = 2. 47, CH= 0. 84, TLI = 0. 82, RMSEA = 0. 09). The scores of CASK dimensions and total scores of caregivers after attending the training were higher than those before the training ( Ps < 0. 001). The Cronbach a coefficients were 0. 96 for the total scale and 0. 81 - 0. 92 for each dimension. The retest reliabilities were 0. 85 for the total scale and 0. 63 -0. 87 for each dimension. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the caregiver coping skills scale has good validity and reliability, and could be used to evaluate the level of caregivers of eating disorders in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

目的：评估进食障碍照料者技能量表 （CASK）中文版在神经性厌食和神经性贪食患者的照 料者中应用的效度和信度。方法：选取符合DSM5诊断标准的神经性厌食和神经性贪食患者的照料者 151 名，进行 CASK 测评；选取其中 37 名照料者进行照料者技能培训，比较培训前后 CASK得分以检验实证 效度。结果：探索性因子分析抽取大局观、自我照料、闭嘴、理解接纳、情商、挫折耐受６个因子；验证 性因子分析显示６因子模型拟合良好 （χ²／ df ＝ 2.47，CFI ＝ 0.84，TLI＝ 0.82，RMSEA＝ 0.09）；照料者在 参与照料技能培训后的 CASK各维度得分及总分均高于培训前 （均Ｐ＜ 0.001）。总量表的 Cronbacha 系数 为 0.96 ，各维度的α系数为 0.81～0.92 ；总量表的重测信度为 0.85，各维度的重测信度为 0.67～ 0.87。结 论：进食障碍照料者技能量表中文版具有良好的效度和信度，可用于评估国内进食障碍患者照料者的照料 技能水平。 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Chinese Mental Health Journal / Zhongguo Xinli Weisheng Zazhi is the property of Chinese Mental Health Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)