男同性恋身份认同量表的编制. (Chinese)

Objective:To develop the Gay Identity Scale (GIS) in China for the measurement of gay male’s identity acceptance from social relationship perspective, and examine its validity and reliability.Methods:Based on the results of the in-depth interviews, literature review, and two rounds of experts’ consultations, the initial GIS was developed.Item analyses and exploratory factor analysis were firstly conducted (n=289), confirm factor analysis and criterion-related validity were subsequently conducted (n=300) by using the Internalized Homonegativity Scale (IHS) and Inclusion of Community in the Self Scale (ICS) .Retests were conducted among 40 participants for the test-retest reliability.Results:The GIS consisted of 23 items.The exploratory factor analysis produced 5 factors, including self-acceptance, same-sex romantic belief, acceptance from parents, gay community belongingness, and acceptance from the heterosexual community.The 5 factors explained 63.82% of the total variance.The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 5 factors fitted well with the concept model (χ²/df=2.51, CFI=0.92, TLI=0.90, RMSEA=0.07, SRMR=0.06) .The total scores of GIS were negatively correlated with the IHS scores (r=-0.46, P ＜0.001), and positively correlated with the ICS scores (r=0.47, P ＜0.001) .The Cronbach’s α coefficients were 0.92 for the total scale and 0.72-0.88 for each factor.The test-retest reliabilities (ICC) were 0.71 for the total scale and 0.56-0.88 for the five dimensions.Conclusion:The Gay Identity Scale has the potential for measurement of Chinese gay’s identity acceptance from social relationship perspective, it has relatively good validity and reliability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

目的:编制男同性恋身份认同量表 (GIS),从社会关系视角测评我国男同性恋者的身份接纳状况,并检验其效度和信度。方法:基于文献回顾、深入访谈和两轮专家咨询,编制初始量表,在289名男同性恋者中初测,进行条目分析和探索性因子分析;另外选取300名男同性恋者,进行验证性因子分析及效标关联效度、内部一致性信度检验,选取其中 40 名间隔 2 周重测。采用内化恐同量表 (IHS)个体融入群体量表 (ICS) 为效标工具。结果:GIS共23个条目,包括自我接纳、同性情感关系认同、获得父母接纳、同性恋群体归属和获得异性恋群体接纳5个因子,累计贡献率为63.82%;验证性因子分析结果显示模型拟合满足要求 (χ²/df=2.51,CFI=0.92,TLI=0.90,RMSEA=0.07,SRMR=0.06) ;GIS 总分与IHS得分呈负相关 (r=-0.46,P＜0.001),与ICS得分呈正相关 (r=0.47,P＜0.001) 。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.92,5个因子的Cronbachα系数在 0.72～0.88 之间;总量表的重测信度为 0.71,5个因子的重测信度 (ICC) 在0.56～0.88之间。结论:本研究编制的男同性恋身份认同量表测评围绕社会关系的身份接纳状况,具有良好的效度和信度。 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Chinese Mental Health Journal / Zhongguo Xinli Weisheng Zazhi is the property of Chinese Mental Health Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)