The effect of structural damping on flow-induced vibration of a thin elliptical cylinder.

This study experimentally investigates the influence of structural damping on the transverse flow-induced vibration (FIV) of an elastically mounted thin elliptical cylinder. The cylinder tested has an elliptical ratio of $\varepsilon = b/a = 5$ , where $a$ and $b$ are the streamwise and cross-flow dimensions, respectively, and a mass ratio (i.e. the total oscillating mass/the displaced fluid mass) of $17.4$. The FIV response was characterised over a reduced velocity range of $2.30 \leq U^* = U/(\,{{f_{{nw}}}} b) \leq 10.00$ (corresponding to a Reynolds number range of $300 \leq \textit {Re} =(U b)/\nu \leq 1300$) and a structural damping ratio range of $3.62\times 10^{-3}\leq \zeta \leq 1.87\times 10^{-1}$. Here, $U$ is the free stream velocity, ${{f_{{nw}}}}$ is the natural frequency of the system in quiescent fluid (water) and $\nu$ is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid. The FIV response was characterised by four wake–body synchronisation regimes (defined as the matching of the dominant fluid forcing and oscillation frequencies, and labelled regime I, regime II, regime III and the hyper branch) and a desynchronisation region, with the hyper branch representing a high amplitude regime not observed for a circular cylinder. Interestingly, the major vortex shedding mode was predominately two single opposite-signed vortices shed per body vibration cycle. Moreover, hydrogen-bubble-based flow visualisations revealed a secondary vortex street forming in the elongated shear layers associated with largest-scale vibration amplitudes ($A^* = A/b$ up to $7.7$) in the hyper branch and regime II. As the structural damping ratio was increased beyond $1.92 \times 10^{-2}$ , the hyper branch was found to be suppressed. The results have potential ramifications for the efficient extraction of energy from free-flowing water sources, which has become increasingly topical over the last decade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Fluid Mechanics is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)