Consumers or Patients? Medical Device Recipients under Australian Law Straddle Two Worlds.

This article analyses the status of medical device recipients under Australian law. The 2021 Gill v Ethicon Sàrl litigation in the Federal Court of Australia has brought the issue to the fore. Moving from the Court's findings, the article dissects the specific vulnerability of medical device recipients and explores the under-researched distinction between patients and consumers under Australian law. The analysis spans the regulatory landscape for medical devices prior to marketing approval, the statutory protections and causes of actions available to consumers under the Australian Consumer Law, and the safeguards for patients developed under medical law (particularly medical negligence). In addition to doctrinal clarifications, the article provides a discussion of key policy considerations that frame the various regimes. Patients and consumers share characteristics, but their legal protections differ in terms of focus and objectives. Medical device recipients straddle both worlds, requiring the highest levels of care and disclosure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Law & Medicine is the property of Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)