CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION AND INSTITUTIONAL OBJECTION TO VOLUNTARY ASSISTANCE IN DYING: AN ETHICO-LEGAL CRITIQUE.
In: Journal of Law & Medicine, Jg. 30 (2023-12-01), Heft 4, S. 806-821
academicJournal
Zugriff:
This column examines conscientious objection and institutional objection in Australian voluntary assistance in dying. It reviews the current legislative regimes and then examines these practices from an ethical perspective, and raises particular concerns and suggestions with how conscientious objection and institutional objection should be operationalised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Law & Medicine is the property of Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Titel: |
CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION AND INSTITUTIONAL OBJECTION TO VOLUNTARY ASSISTANCE IN DYING: AN ETHICO-LEGAL CRITIQUE.
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Kerridge, Ian ; Stewart, Cameron ; Scully, Jackie Leach ; Chiarella, Mary ; Hamblin, Julie ; Johnson, Adam ; Ryan, Christopher ; Sheahan, Linda ; Skowronski, George |
Zeitschrift: | Journal of Law & Medicine, Jg. 30 (2023-12-01), Heft 4, S. 806-821 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2023 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 1320-159X (print) |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|