Reducing decisional conflict in decisions about prenatal genetic testing: the impact of a dyadic intervention at the start of prenatal care.
In: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Jg. 52 (2024-06-01), Heft 5, S. 467-477
academicJournal
Zugriff:
Decisional conflict and regret about prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic tests may have important consequences in the current pregnancy and for future reproductive decisions. Identifying mechanisms that reduce conflict associated with the decision to use or decline these options is necessary for optimal patient counseling. We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a shared decision-making tool (NEST) at the beginning of prenatal care. Enrolled patients completed follow-up surveys at the time of testing (QTT) and in the second–third trimester (QFF), including the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS). Total DCS scores were analyzed using a multivariate linear mixed-effect model. Of the total number of participants (n=502) enrolled, 449 completed the QTT and QFF surveys. The mean age of participants was 31.6±3.8, with most parous at the time of study participation (n=321; 71.7 %). Both the NEST (the intervention) and control groups had lower median total DCS scores at QFF (NEST 13.3 [1.7, 25.0] vs. control 16.7 [1.7, 25.0]; p=0.24) compared to QTT (NEST 20.8 [5.0, 25.0] vs. control 18.3 [3.3, 26.7]; p=0.89). Participants exposed to NEST had lower decisional conflict at QFF compared to control (β −3.889; [CI −7.341, −0.437]; p=0.027). Using a shared decision-making tool at the start of prenatal care decreased decisional conflict regarding prenatal genetic testing. Such interventions have the potential to provide an important form of decision-making support for patients facing the unique type of complex and preference-based choices about the use of prenatal genetic tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Perinatal Medicine is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Titel: |
Reducing decisional conflict in decisions about prenatal genetic testing: the impact of a dyadic intervention at the start of prenatal care.
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Collart, Christina ; Craighead, Caitlin ; Yao, Meng ; Rose, Susannah ; Chien, Edward K. ; Frankel, Richard M. ; Coleridge, Marissa ; Hu, Bo ; Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker ; Ranzini, Angela C. ; Farrell, Ruth M. |
Zeitschrift: | Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Jg. 52 (2024-06-01), Heft 5, S. 467-477 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2024 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 0300-5577 (print) |
DOI: | 10.1515/jpm-2023-0442 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|