Concept and feasibility of the Augsburg Longitudinal Plasma Study (ALPS) – a prospective trial for comprehensive liquid biopsy-based longitudinal monitoring of solid cancer patients.

Liquid biopsy (LBx) provides diagnostic, prognostic and predictive insights for malignant diseases and offers promising applications regarding tumor burden, tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution. The Augsburg Longitudinal Plasma Study (ALPS) is a prospective trial for patients with metastatic cancer that comprises sequential collection of LBx samples, tumor tissue, radiological imaging data, clinical information and patient-reported outcomes. Peripheral blood plasma is collected based on the individual patient's staging intervals and LBx-derived ctDNA analyses are performed using CAncer Personalized Profiling sequencing (CAPP-seq). From April 2021 to October 2023, 419 patients have been enrolled. A total of 1,293 LBx samples were collected, 419 samples (100 %) at the beginning of the study and an average of 3 (range 1–12) during the 30-month follow-up period of the current interim analysis. 380 tissue biopsy (TBx) samples (90.7 %) were available at baseline and 39.6 % had ≥1 TBx samples at follow-up. Lung cancer patients are most prevalent in ALPS (n=147), followed by colorectal (n=38), prostate (n=31) and gastroesophageal cancer (n=28). On average, 12.0 ng/mL plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could be isolated. First CAPP-seq analyses in 60 patients comprised 110 samples and demonstrated a detection sensitivity of 0.1 %. The first interim analysis of ALPS confirms feasibility for comprehensive longitudinal evaluation of LBx and demonstrates suitability for ctDNA evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Laboratory Medicine is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)