Paying for Performance in Primary Medical Care: Learning about and Learning from "Success" and "Failure" in England and California.
In: Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, Jg. 34 (2009-10-01), Heft 5, S. 747-776
academicJournal
Zugriff:
Paying physicians to hit performance targets is becoming increasingly fashionable, as evidenced by the growing number of "pay-for-performance" programs in the United States and beyond. This article compares pay-for-performance initiatives in two nations -- the United Kingdom and the United States. It pays particular attention to the context in which the initiatives were conceived and implemented, factors which are largely neglected in the pay-for-performance literature. Despite some glowing reviews of the UK national pay-for-performance program for primary care doctors, we suggest that such programs face significant technical obstacles in all cases and particularly severe institutional obstacles in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law is the property of Duke University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Titel: |
Paying for Performance in Primary Medical Care: Learning about and Learning from "Success" and "Failure" in England and California.
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | McDonald, Ruth ; White, Joseph ; Marmor, Theodore R. |
Zeitschrift: | Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, Jg. 34 (2009-10-01), Heft 5, S. 747-776 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2009 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 0361-6878 (print) |
DOI: | 10.1215/03616878-2009-024 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|