Coordination between economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from 178 cities in China.

• Coordinated level between city's economic growth and carbon emissions was explored. • Entropy method and coupling coordination model were used for measurement. • Coordinated level of consumption-oriented cities continued to lead. • Central city had the smallest average Dagum Gini coefficient. • Agriculture/forestry-oriented cities were in the stage of moderate/mild maladjustment. Tackling with the contradiction between economic growth and carbon emissions in the high-quality development of the Chinese economy remains a critical issue. Different from previous national, inter-provincial, or county-level studies, our study used the entropy method and coupling coordination model to explore the coordination level between economic growth and carbon emissions based on the panel data of 178 cities in China from 2011 to 2019. Next, we introduced the Dagum Gini coefficient and K-means clustering to compare the city-level differences. The findings revealed the following: (1) Overall, the coordinated level of economic growth and carbon emissions in 178 cities showed a steady upward trend. (2) By decomposing inter-regional differences using the Dagum Gini coefficient, we find disparities are shrinking but remain driven primarily by between-region gaps. (3) Looking across city types, consumption-oriented cities like Beijing and Shanghai with strong service sectors lead in coordination. Among industry-oriented cities, those dependent on resources lag while equipment manufacturing-led and light industry cities fare better. Ecological priority cities show split patterns, with specialized industrial cities moderately coordinated but agriculture-and forestry-oriented cities struggling. Our findings suggested that the coordination level between carbon emissions and economic growth in most cities in China had scope for improvement. Targeted recommendations provide actionable next steps for policymakers in meeting China's "dual carbon" goals while maintaining economic stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Economic Analysis & Policy is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)