RES ADMIRABILAE: LIETUVIŠKOJI IKIKRITINĖS I. KANTO FI LOSOFI JOS RECEPCI JA. (Lithuanian)

This article attempts to give an arguments for the hypothesis, that Lithuanian priest of Piars Kazimieras Narbutas (1738-1807) has been the philosopher, who had an honour to be the first in East, and maybe the whole Europe, to receive and criticise the pre-critical thinking of Immanuel Kant. In 1765, in his course of philosophy at the Collegium of Piars in Dąbrowicy Narbutas criticises the concept of substance suggested by „metaphysician Cantzius‟. A person named as „Cantzius‟ could have been either Immanuel Kant, or theologian Gottlieb Israel Canz. Objecting to the position of Steponas Tunaitis, two arguments have been developed in this article: the person, who was referred to by Narbutas, couldn't have been Canz, since the latter was a representative of the theologian Wolffianism. This philosophical position is close to that of Narbutas himself, his concept of the essence of the substance is the same as that of School of Wolff. Canz couldn't have delivered the concept of substance which were opposite to that of School of Wolff. The second argument states, that the principial propositions (and their consequentials) of Kant provided in his work of 1755 Principorum primorum cognitionis metaphysicae nova dilucidatio could be attributed to the position of „metaphysician Cantzius‟ on the substance, its attributes and the goals of God, which had been questioned by Narbutas. This parallel provides us with an opportunity to state, that Narbutas directly or indirectly has been acquainted with the above mentioned work of Kant and that the person, referred to in the text of Narbutas, is nobody but Kant, who has been dealing with metaphysical matters at that time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Straipsnio paskirtis - teikti argumentus hipotezei, kad lietuvos pijorų kunigui Kazimierui Narbutui (1738- 1807) tenka pirmojo filosofo garbė, kuris anksčiausiai Rytų, gali būti, ir Vakarų, Europoje recipavo ir kritikavo ikikritinio periodo Immanuelio Kanto pažiūras. Narbutas 1765 m. Dombrovicų pijorų kolegijos filosofijos paskaitų kurse kritikuoja „metafiziko Cantzijaus‟ substancijos sampratą. „Cantzijus‟ galėjo būti arba Kantas, arba teologas Gottliebas Israelis Canzas. Straipsnyje, oponuojant Stepui Tunaičiui, plėtojami du argumentai: Narbuto paminėtas asmuo negalėjo būti Canzas, nes jis buvo teologinio volfizmo atstovas. Ši kryptis artima pačiam Narbutui, jo substancijos sąvokos traktavimas būdingas Wolffo mokyklai. Canzas negalėjo pateikti šiai mokyklai priešingą substancijos traktuotę. Antrasis argumentas: esmingus Kanto 1755 m. veikalo Principiorum primorum cognitionis metaphysicae nova dilucidatio teiginius (ir jų sekvencijas) galima sugretinti su Narbuto ginčijama „metafiziko Cantzijaus‟ substancijos, jos savybių ir Dievo tikslų traktuote. Šis sugretinimas leidžia tvirtinti, jog Narbutas tiesiogiai ar tarpiškai buvo susipažinęs su minėtu veikalu ir įvardija ne ką kitą, kaip tuo metu metafizinius klausimus tyrusį jo autorių Immanuelį Kantą. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) is the property of Logos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)